From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934061AbcHJV7g (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:59:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57757 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752702AbcHJV7e (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:59:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:59:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina X-X-Sender: jkosina@pobox.suse.cz To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Borislav Petkov , Thomas Garnier , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Kees Cook , Pavel Machek , Kernel Hardening Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH] x86/power/64: Always create temporary identity mapping correctly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <2206547.eDj3RJQyE5@vostro.rjw.lan> <2010434.TyoHiO9eal@vostro.rjw.lan> <1779906.DOHeuFCiDy@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160810163500.GA9424@nazgul.tnic> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > So I used your .config to generate one for my test machine and with > that I can reproduce. Was that the config I've sent, or did Boris provide one as well? Which one are you able to reproduce with please? > The hardware configuration doesn't matter, then, the issue is config-related. How big is the diff between the two configs? Could you please share it? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs