mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Nilesh Javali <njavali@marvell.com>,
	Arun Easi <aeasi@marvell.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] qla2xxx: Return EBUSY on fcport deletion
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:57:04 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.23.453.2010141103150.6@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201013065232.hdyjdkurkmowkf2f@beryllium.lan>


On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Daniel Wagner wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:59:18AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > 
> > > When the fcport is about to be deleted we should return EBUSY 
> > > instead of ENODEV. Only for EBUSY the request will be requeued in a 
> > > multipath setup.
> > > 
> > > Also in case we have a valid qpair but the firmware has not yet 
> > > started return EBUSY to avoid dropping the request.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > v3: simplify test logic as suggested by Arun.
> > 
> > Not exactly a "simplification": there was a change of behaviour 
> > between v2 and v3. It seems the commit log no longer reflects the 
> > code.
> 
> How so? I am struggling to see how it could be a change in behavior. But 
> then I sometimes fail at simple logic ;)
> 

Me too, so I confirmed the result by executing the code snippets.

> v2 and v3 will return ENODEV if qpair or fcport are invalid and for 
> EBUSY one of the other condition needs be true. The difference between 
> v2 and v3 should only be the order how tests are executed. The outcome 
> should be the same.
> 

Here's a truth table for v2:

qpair fw_started fcport deleted result
---------------------------------------
F       X       F       X       -ENODEV
F       F       T       F       -ENODEV
F       F       T       T       -EBUSY  *
F       T       T       F       -ENODEV
F       T       T       T       -EBUSY  *
T       F       F       X       -EBUSY  *
T       F       T       X       -EBUSY
T       T       F       X       -ENODEV
T       T       T       F       neither
T       T       T       T       -EBUSY

Here's a truth table for v3:

qpair fw_started fcport deleted result
---------------------------------------
F       X       F       X       -ENODEV
F       F       T       F       -ENODEV
F       F       T       T       -ENODEV *
F       T       T       F       -ENODEV
F       T       T       T       -ENODEV *
T       F       F       X       -ENODEV *
T       F       T       X       -EBUSY
T       T       F       X       -ENODEV
T       T       T       F       neither
T       T       T       T       -EBUSY

The asterisks mark the changed rows.

I don't know whether the changes in v3 are desirable or not, I was just 
pointing out that the commit log ("valid qpair but the firmware has not 
yet started return EBUSY") now seems to disagree with the code.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-14  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-12 17:35 Daniel Wagner
2020-10-12 18:14 ` [EXT] " Arun Easi
2020-10-12 23:59 ` Finn Thain
2020-10-13  6:52   ` Daniel Wagner
2020-10-14  0:57     ` Finn Thain [this message]
2020-10-14  7:06       ` Daniel Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.23.453.2010141103150.6@nippy.intranet \
    --to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=aeasi@marvell.com \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=njavali@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®