From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757743Ab0I0XqO (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:46:14 -0400 Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:56612 "EHLO tundra.namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752356Ab0I0XqM (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:46:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:45:41 +1000 (EST) From: James Morris To: Eric Paris cc: Paul Moore , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, jengelh@medozas.de, casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org, mr.dash.four@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] secmark: export binary yes/no rather than kernel internal secid In-Reply-To: <1285615525.2815.76.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20100924204517.28355.42822.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <20100924204531.28355.20320.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <1285606896.2815.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1285612156.4935.16.camel@sifl> <1285615525.2815.76.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Eric Paris wrote: > James, if you are adamant about #1 I'll resend, otherwise I'm sticking > with #3..... Looks like #3 it is. -- James Morris