From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752008Ab3KSFbG (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:31:06 -0500 Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:35370 "EHLO tundra.namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751803Ab3KSFbE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:31:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:38:02 +1100 (EST) From: James Morris To: Linus Torvalds cc: Josh Boyer , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , linux-security-module , David Howells Subject: Re: [GIT] Security subsystem updates for 3.13 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:30 PM, James Morris wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> > >> Unless I'm missing something, I don't think this has landed in Linus' > >> tree yet. Linus, did this pull request get NAKed or fall through the > >> cracks? > > > > I think Linus is on vacation and merging only sporadically at the moment. > > No,while it is true that I've been traveling, I've also been actively > merging, and no, that pull request isn't lost. > > I don't really like the look of it though (particularly all the magic > new keys changes), so I've been delaying it and merging other regular > stuff that I don't have any issues with. I'm leaving that pull for > later in order to go over it more carefully when I'm not doing fifteen > other pulls the same day.. > > If somebody wants to explain about the rationale new keys code, that might help. Thanks -- I've cc'd David for comment. -- James Morris