From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753852AbaCMJa6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:30:58 -0400 Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:37602 "EHLO tundra.namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753593AbaCMJa4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:30:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:33:06 +1100 (EST) From: James Morris To: Kees Cook cc: Andrew Morton , "jwboyer@fedoraproject.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Trusted kernel patchset for Secure Boot lockdown In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1393445473-15068-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> <1394686919.25122.2.camel@x230> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Matthew Garrett > wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 14:03 +1100, James Morris wrote: > > > >> Ok, which tree should take this? I'm happy to, although most of it is > >> outside security/ . > > > > Should I be looking for someone else to take them instead? :) > > Andrew, is this series[1] something you'd be okay taking? It touches > many different areas, so you might be best for it. I'll take it, but there's unanswered review feedback (your response to the first question), and Alan raised some doubts about the patches which I'm not sure have been resolved. -- James Morris