From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756190AbaIPCPv (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:15:51 -0400 Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:34453 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752725AbaIPCPs (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:15:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:15:42 +1000 (EST) From: James Morris To: David Howells cc: keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Miscellaneous fixes In-Reply-To: <27397.1410786297@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <20140910212154.10752.23343.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <27397.1410786297@warthog.procyon.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LRH 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, David Howells wrote: > Hi James, > > Thanks for pushing the first patch. Any thoughts on what to do with the > remaining patches? #5 and #6 at least ought to go upstream as there's a > potential memory leak fixed and #2 because the keyutils testsuite is failing > without it. From what Mimi says, I think she's withdrawn her objection to #2. Can you split your pull requests into different branches -- one which is for current upstream, and one which is for next? -- James Morris