From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751208AbdAaXRx (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:17:53 -0500 Received: from mx.ewheeler.net ([66.155.3.69]:36348 "EHLO mail.ewheeler.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750885AbdAaXRw (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:17:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:17:45 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Wheeler X-X-Sender: lists@mail.ewheeler.net To: Jens Axboe cc: Kent Overstreet , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kai Krakow , Wido den Hollander , Emmanuel Florac , Hans van den Bogert , "Jens-U. Mozdzen" Subject: Re: [PULL] bcache: based on for-4.10/block, multiple updates In-Reply-To: <15228b09-e185-7587-c905-700ca878e80f@kernel.dk> Message-ID: References: <5160da7c-e38e-1527-2b09-2ca240df57c3@kernel.dk> <20161030140050.q6ywphi3by6yoczc@kmo-pixel> <6bda49c5-5ed8-939f-aab3-faa9c8127ff0@kernel.dk> <15228b09-e185-7587-c905-700ca878e80f@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LRH 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 01/31/2017 11:14 AM, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> On 12/14/2016 06:50 PM, Eric Wheeler wrote: > >>> Hi Jens, > >>> > >>> I know you're busy, so when you get a moment: > >>> > >>> I've not yet seen your ack/nack on this yet and I want to make sure it > >>> gets in before the merge window closes for v4.10. I rebased it on > >>> for-4.10/block as you asked so its tested and ready to go as of 12/6 > >>> unless you see something that I've missed. > >> > >> Pulled for 4.10, sorry about the delay. > > > > Hi Jens, > > > > Looking at 4.10-rc6, I see these two commits were merged: > > > >> bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device > >> bcache: Make gc wakeup sane, remove set_task_state() > > > > but these were in the same 'for-4.10-block-bcache-updates' and don't > > appear to have been applied: > > > >> bcache: introduce per-process ioprio-based bypass/writeback hints > >> bcache: documentation for ioprio cache hinting > >> bcache: update bio->bi_opf bypass/writeback REQ_ flag hints > > > > Did I miss an email that caused their exclusion? > > > > Did these get bumped to 4.11 for some reason? > > I thought I sent out that reply, maybe I didn't. I dropped the > last three for two reasons: > > 1) They happened after the merge window, and it's really a feature > addon that should have gone in earlier Onto 4.11 then. Hopefully this is early enough :) > > 2) There seemed to be confusion and discussion around the interface > that needed to be resolved first. None that I'm aware of. This is a bcache-only feature and doesn't affect non-bcache users. In fact, people are using it as a patch with good results since they can control their erase-block churn. Kent Overstreet acked it, too. Can you pull this for 4.11? Thank you for your help! -- Eric Wheeler > > Hope that explains it. > > -- > Jens Axboe > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >