From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755669AbcBIBAJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:00:09 -0500 Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:38274 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752912AbcBIBAG (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:00:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:59:57 +1100 (AEDT) From: James Morris To: Jarkko Sakkinen cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tpmdd fixes for Linux 4.5 In-Reply-To: <20160208204610.GA14626@intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20160119233903.GA12337@intel.com> <20160208204610.GA14626@intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > James, > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:39:03AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > This pull request contains three small cleanups, a bug fix for policy > > based sealing, a bug fix for attach/detach of the platform device for > > tpm_tis and resource locking for tpm_tis and tpm_crb. > > I have 3-4 small scope fixes for the release that have been implemented > after this. > > Since it's bee a while since this pull request should I create a new one > and include those or do you want to pull this first? > > I could rebase that new pull request to -rc3 to which security/next is > now rebased. > The latter is probably best. -- James Morris