From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932635AbcBPOV0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:21:26 -0500 Received: from smtp1.it.da.ut.ee ([193.40.5.66]:36341 "EHLO smtp1.it.da.ut.ee" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932576AbcBPOVY (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:21:24 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1221 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:21:24 EST Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:05:21 +0200 (EET) From: Meelis Roos To: Linux Kernel list Subject: Should I report UBSAN Undefined behaviour warnings? Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have turned on UBSAN on multiple test machines to see what it's like and it gives me multiple kinds of warnings from multiple places in code. What's the status of UBSAN - should I report them or not yet? -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)