From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752038AbcGUXJv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:09:51 -0400 Received: from [65.99.196.166] ([65.99.196.166]:44007 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750916AbcGUXJt (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:09:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:09:18 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Paul Moore cc: Vivek Goyal , miklos@szeredi.hu, Stephen Smalley , Paul Moore , casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Dan Walsh , dhowells@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1468421095-22322-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Paul Moore wrote: > James, assuming the overlayfs-next branch is pulled during the merge > window, can you rebase your linux-security#next branch to v4.8-rc1 > once Linus tags it? Yep. -- James Morris