From: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
To: tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
dsahern@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
wangnan0@huawei.com, acme@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf test shell: Install shell tests
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:44:14 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1708142033290.13365@Diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-j21u4v0jsehi0lpwqwjb4j45@git.kernel.org>
Hi Arnaldo!
Maybe this would be the right time to incorporate the shell-based
perftool-testsuite [1] into perf-test, wouldn't it?
It already contains bunch of shell-based perf tests that cover
25+ RH bugs...
A little problem might be different design, since the testsuite
has multiple levels of hierarchy of sub-sub-sub-tests, like:
...
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax :: custom named probe :: add
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax :: custom named probe :: list
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax :: custom named probe :: use
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax :: various syntax forms :: vfs_read@fs/read_write.c
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax :: various syntax forms :: vfs_read:11@fs/read_write.c
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax :: various syntax forms :: vfs_read@fs/read_write.c:11
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax :: various syntax forms :: vfs_read%return
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax :: various syntax forms :: test.c:29
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax :: various syntax forms :: func%return $retval
## [ PASS ] ## perf_probe :: test_probe_syntax SUMMARY
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: adding SDT tracepoints as probes
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: listing added probes
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf stat (N = 13)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf stat (N = 128)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf stat (N = 241)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf record (N = 37)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf report (N = 37)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf script (N = 37)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf record (N = 97)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf report (N = 97)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf script (N = 97)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf record (N = 237)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf report (N = 237)
-- [ PASS ] -- perf_probe :: test_sdt :: using probes :: perf script (N = 237)
## [ PASS ] ## perf_probe :: test_sdt SUMMARY
...
... which does not exactly match how perf-test is structured, however,
I think that the multi-level structure of the testsuite is important
for keeping some order in it...
What do you think?
Cheers,
Michael
[1] https://github.com/rfmvh/perftool-testsuite
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Commit-ID: 122e0b947052f6106595fa29d63d514d2ebcdad9
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/122e0b947052f6106595fa29d63d514d2ebcdad9
> Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> AuthorDate: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 12:19:44 -0300
> Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> CommitDate: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:06:28 -0300
>
> perf test shell: Install shell tests
>
> Now that we have shell tests, install them.
>
> Developers don't need this pass, as 'perf test' will look first at the
> in tree scripts at tools/perf/tests/shell/.
>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-j21u4v0jsehi0lpwqwjb4j45@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> index c1f7884..eb13567 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> @@ -760,7 +760,9 @@ install-tests: all install-gtk
> $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests'; \
> $(INSTALL) tests/attr.py '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests'; \
> $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/attr'; \
> - $(INSTALL) tests/attr/* '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/attr'
> + $(INSTALL) tests/attr/* '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/attr'; \
> + $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell'; \
> + $(INSTALL) tests/shell/*.sh '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell'
>
> install-bin: install-tools install-tests install-traceevent-plugins
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-14 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-14 17:46 tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-08-14 18:44 ` Michael Petlan [this message]
2017-08-14 20:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-08-14 21:01 ` Michael Petlan
2017-08-15 15:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-08-15 22:31 ` Michael Petlan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.20.1708142033290.13365@Diego \
--to=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®