From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com,
arnd@arndb.de, broonie@kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix y2038 issues for security/keys subsystem
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:11:27 +1000 (AEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1709281910430.6300@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1505960744.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org>
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Since 'time_t', 'timeval' and 'timespec' types are not year 2038 safe on
> 32 bits system, this patchset tries to fix this issues for security/keys
> subsystem.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Add reviewed tag from Arnd.
> - Drop Patch 3 which had been merged into kernel 4.14 by David.
>
> Baolin Wang (2):
> security: keys: Replace time_t/timespec with time64_t
> security: keys: Replace time_t with time64_t for struct
> key_preparsed_payload
>
> include/linux/key-type.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/key.h | 7 ++++---
> security/keys/gc.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> security/keys/internal.h | 8 ++++----
> security/keys/key.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
> security/keys/keyring.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> security/keys/permission.c | 3 +--
> security/keys/proc.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> security/keys/process_keys.c | 2 +-
> 9 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
David, have you taken these into your tree? I can apply them to mine if
needed.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-28 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-21 2:32 Baolin Wang
2017-09-21 2:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] security: keys: Replace time_t/timespec with time64_t Baolin Wang
2017-09-21 2:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] security: keys: Replace time_t with time64_t for struct key_preparsed_payload Baolin Wang
2017-09-28 9:11 ` James Morris [this message]
2017-09-28 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix y2038 issues for security/keys subsystem David Howells
2017-09-28 9:48 ` James Morris
2017-09-28 22:05 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.1709281910430.6300@namei.org \
--to=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®