From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A2FECDFAA for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4421208AD for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:49:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D4421208AD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ee Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728417AbeGPRRk (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:17:40 -0400 Received: from smtp2.it.da.ut.ee ([193.40.5.67]:41238 "EHLO smtp2.it.da.ut.ee" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727411AbeGPRRk (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:17:40 -0400 Received: from math.ut.ee (unknown [IPv6:2001:bb8:2002:2400:5054:ff:fe3b:8db9]) by smtp2.it.da.ut.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035B2901DB; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:49:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: by math.ut.ee (Postfix, from userid 1014) id E5E792208EC; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:49:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by math.ut.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BC92206C6; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:49:21 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:49:21 +0300 (EEST) From: Meelis Roos To: Arnd Bergmann cc: Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: 4.18-rc* regression: x86-32 troubles (with timers?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Everything below here is is 'bad', which can be an indication that you > misclassified one of > the commits above as 'good' when it should have been 'bad'. The most likely > explanations are that you either typed the 'git bisect good' by accident, or > that the failure is not 100% reliable, and it sometimes works fine even on a > broken kernel. > > 0bc5fe857274133ca0 follows directly after 3a443bd6dd7c, "net/9p: correct the > variable name in v9fs_get_trans_by_name() comment", which is marked "good", > and can't really be good if 0bc5fe85727413 is bad and you are not using the > 'qed' driver. > > I'd retest 3a443bd6dd7c again to see if that should have been 'bad', and > if it was, test v4.17-rc4, which is what the net-next tree was based on. Yes, the same prebuilt 3a443bd6dd7c appeared to be bad when retesting it. Building v4.17-rc4 now. -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)