From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF14BC43334 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 00:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B271E20645 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 00:08:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B271E20645 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=namei.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726444AbeIFElL (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 00:41:11 -0400 Received: from namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:46164 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725781AbeIFElK (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 00:41:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by namei.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w8608UTA023519; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 00:08:30 GMT Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:08:30 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Kees Cook cc: Igor Stoppa , Igor Stoppa , linux-security-module , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: remove unnecessary unlikely() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20180905203443.32289-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> <2192189d-b8bb-3233-c9f3-14cbeeddaf34@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Igor Stoppa wrote: > > > > > > On 06/09/18 01:23, Kees Cook wrote: > > > >> Should I take this, or is it part of your series going somewhere else? > > > > > > It turned out it doesn't really work to have a generic series against 20 > > trees :-/ > > I know that pain very well! > > > I'm submitting them individually to each subsystem. > > So this one is just for security. > > Sounds good. > > James, can you take this directly, or would you prefer a pull request from me? I'll take it with your ack. -- James Morris