From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=fl2C=S4=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B62C4321A
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:03:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7A02084F
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:03:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1729244AbfDZAD0 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 25 Apr 2019 20:03:26 -0400
Received: from namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:35900 "EHLO namei.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1728999AbfDZAD0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 25 Apr 2019 20:03:26 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by namei.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x3Q03BnM013918;
        Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:03:11 GMT
Date:   Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:03:11 +1000 (AEST)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        prsriva <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>,
        Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        inux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>, vgoyal@redhat.com,
        Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the
 call generic
In-Reply-To: <1556234338.2788.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904261002480.13876@namei.org>
References: <20190424001544.7188-1-prsriva02@gmail.com>         <20190424001544.7188-2-prsriva02@gmail.com>         <d38f32f8-7078-f205-ba11-9c4266ee40e8@linux.vnet.ibm.com>         <4c313367-22dc-9532-54b5-cd3a79deb625@linux.microsoft.com>        
 <CAADWXX8NC-PFJmuvQbNXn49CYjvyn-e0rtH_EoUfCvuJHTwHAQ@mail.gmail.com>         <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904260833140.7315@namei.org> <1556234338.2788.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, James Bottomley wrote:

> That's not the correct location: DMARC records should be at the _dmarc.
> subdomain.  without this you'll inherit the dmarc policy of
> _dmarc.microsoft.com
> 

Thanks.

> > We don't have DKIM set up yet.
> 
> If you advertise DMARC, you're expected to have DKIM working for spam
> purposes.  On the other hand, if you don't advertise DMARC, google will
> probably still bin all your email as spam.

Working on it.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>