mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: fix race in rcu lookup of pruned dentry
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:07:54 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1107181903350.23830@sister.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110718234012.GL11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:27:53PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > Linus, are you OK with me slapping your s-o-b on it?
> > 
> > Yup.
> > 
> > And it feels so right that I think we should just do it for 3.0.

It looked sane, but in fact was insane.  Enough testing for now,
I say it's good to go, if you fold in this small adjustment...

[PATCH] fix sense of __read_seqcount_retry test

Hah, good thing I hacked something in to check we're going the quick
way: __read_seqcount_retry() returns *true* when a retry is needed.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
---
 fs/namei.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- 3.0-git+/fs/namei.c	2011-07-18 18:31:36.273731128 -0700
+++ linux/fs/namei.c	2011-07-18 18:32:35.158022444 -0700
@@ -960,7 +960,7 @@ static bool __follow_mount_rcu(struct na
 		 * so we can use __read_seqcount_retry() to check the prev
 		 * sequence numbers.
 		 */
-		if (!__read_seqcount_retry(&path->dentry->d_seq, nd->seq))
+		if (__read_seqcount_retry(&path->dentry->d_seq, nd->seq))
 			return false;
 		path->mnt = mounted;
 		path->dentry = mounted->mnt_root;

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-19  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-17 21:03 Hugh Dickins
2011-07-17 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-17 22:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-17 23:26     ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:16   ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:38     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-17 23:47       ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18  0:25         ` Al Viro
2011-07-18  1:13           ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18  2:08             ` Al Viro
2011-07-18  6:31               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 14:41                 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 18:11                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 18:20                   ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 19:08                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 19:20                       ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 19:23                         ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 19:34                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 19:04                   ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 19:33                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 19:47                       ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 20:24                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 21:19                           ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 21:42                             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 22:43                               ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 23:17                                 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 23:21                                   ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 23:27                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 23:40                                       ` Al Viro
2011-07-19  2:07                                         ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2011-07-19  2:14                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19  2:17                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19  2:23                                               ` Al Viro
2011-07-19  2:37                                                 ` Chris Ball
2011-07-19  4:41                                                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-07-19  2:21                                           ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 23:45                               ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 23:52                                 ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 23:55                                   ` Al Viro
2011-07-20  0:47                                     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-20  1:40                                       ` Al Viro
2011-07-20  4:52                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19 23:56                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20  0:04                                   ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:53       ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:31   ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-17 23:52     ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1107181903350.23830@sister.anvils \
    --to=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome