From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: fix race in rcu lookup of pruned dentry
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:07:54 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1107181903350.23830@sister.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110718234012.GL11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:27:53PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > Linus, are you OK with me slapping your s-o-b on it?
> >
> > Yup.
> >
> > And it feels so right that I think we should just do it for 3.0.
It looked sane, but in fact was insane. Enough testing for now,
I say it's good to go, if you fold in this small adjustment...
[PATCH] fix sense of __read_seqcount_retry test
Hah, good thing I hacked something in to check we're going the quick
way: __read_seqcount_retry() returns *true* when a retry is needed.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
---
fs/namei.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 3.0-git+/fs/namei.c 2011-07-18 18:31:36.273731128 -0700
+++ linux/fs/namei.c 2011-07-18 18:32:35.158022444 -0700
@@ -960,7 +960,7 @@ static bool __follow_mount_rcu(struct na
* so we can use __read_seqcount_retry() to check the prev
* sequence numbers.
*/
- if (!__read_seqcount_retry(&path->dentry->d_seq, nd->seq))
+ if (__read_seqcount_retry(&path->dentry->d_seq, nd->seq))
return false;
path->mnt = mounted;
path->dentry = mounted->mnt_root;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-17 21:03 Hugh Dickins
2011-07-17 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-17 22:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-17 23:26 ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:16 ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-17 23:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 0:25 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 1:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 2:08 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 6:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 14:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 18:20 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 19:20 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 19:23 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 19:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 19:47 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 21:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 22:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 23:17 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 23:21 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 23:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 23:40 ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 2:07 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2011-07-19 2:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19 2:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19 2:23 ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 2:37 ` Chris Ball
2011-07-19 4:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-07-19 2:21 ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 23:45 ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 23:52 ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 23:55 ` Al Viro
2011-07-20 0:47 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-20 1:40 ` Al Viro
2011-07-20 4:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19 23:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20 0:04 ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:53 ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:31 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-17 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1107181903350.23830@sister.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome