From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: fix page table accounting
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:07:13 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1210101458310.2002@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506DAFBA020000780009FA8C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Commit 20167d3421a089a1bf1bd680b150dc69c9506810 ("x86-64: Fix
> accounting in kernel_physical_mapping_init()") went a little too far
> by entirely removing the counting of pre-populated page tables: This
> should be done at boot time (to cover the page tables set up in early
> boot code), but shouldn't be done during memory hot add.
>
> Hence, re-add the removed increments of "pages", but make them and the
> one in phys_pte_init() conditional upon !after_bootmem.
>
> Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
I think this has not yet been picked up: perhaps it's awaiting an
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
or a
Tested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
but I hesitated to give those because you understand what's going
on here much better than I pretend to.
>
> ---
> Not sure if this ought to be copied to stable@.
I guess not. Much as I like my kernels to show good meminfo numbers,
I was recently saying that David Rientjes's patches to get Unevictable
and Mlocked right were not important enough for stable, and I think
those numbers are more interesting to most people than the DirectMaps.
But I'd be happily overruled on all three patches.
Hugh
>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- 3.6/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ 3.6-x86_64-page-table-count/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,8 @@ phys_pte_init(pte_t *pte_page, unsigned
> * these mappings are more intelligent.
> */
> if (pte_val(*pte)) {
> - pages++;
> + if (!after_bootmem)
> + pages++;
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -451,6 +452,8 @@ phys_pmd_init(pmd_t *pmd_page, unsigned
> * attributes.
> */
> if (page_size_mask & (1 << PG_LEVEL_2M)) {
> + if (!after_bootmem)
> + pages++;
> last_map_addr = next;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -526,6 +529,8 @@ phys_pud_init(pud_t *pud_page, unsigned
> * attributes.
> */
> if (page_size_mask & (1 << PG_LEVEL_1G)) {
> + if (!after_bootmem)
> + pages++;
> last_map_addr = next;
> continue;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-10 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 13:48 Jan Beulich
2012-10-10 22:07 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2012-10-24 10:10 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-64: Fix " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1210101458310.2002@eggly.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome