From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ddstreet@ieee.org, mgorman@suse.de,
k.kozlowski@samsung.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swap: Avoid scanning invalidated region for cheap seek
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 20:53:00 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1405272037080.1126@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401069659-29589-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com>
On Mon, 26 May 2014, Chen Yucong wrote:
> For cheap seek, when we scan the region between si->lowset_bit
> and scan_base, if san_base is greater than si->highest_bit, the
> scan operation between si->highest_bit and scan_base is not
> unnecessary.
>
> This patch can be used to avoid scanning invalidated region for
> cheap seek.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
I was going to suggest that you are adding a little code to a common
path, in order to optimize a very unlikely case: which does not seem
worthwhile to me.
But digging a little deeper, I think you have hit upon something more
interesting (though still in no need of your patch): it looks to me
like that is not even a common path, but dead code.
Shaohua, am I missing something, or does all SWP_SOLIDSTATE "seek is
cheap" now go your si->cluster_info scan_swap_map_try_ssd_cluster()
route? So that the "last_in_cluster < scan_base" loop in the body
of scan_swap_map() is just redundant, and should have been deleted?
Hugh
> ---
> mm/swapfile.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index beeeef8..7f0f27e 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ static unsigned long scan_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> {
> unsigned long offset;
> unsigned long scan_base;
> + unsigned long upper_bound;
> unsigned long last_in_cluster = 0;
> int latency_ration = LATENCY_LIMIT;
>
> @@ -551,9 +552,11 @@ static unsigned long scan_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>
> offset = si->lowest_bit;
> last_in_cluster = offset + SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
> + upper_bound = (scan_base <= si->highest_bit) ?
> + scan_base : (si->highest_bit + 1);
>
> /* Locate the first empty (unaligned) cluster */
> - for (; last_in_cluster < scan_base; offset++) {
> + for (; last_in_cluster < upper_bound; offset++) {
> if (si->swap_map[offset])
> last_in_cluster = offset + SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
> else if (offset == last_in_cluster) {
> --
> 1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 2:00 Chen Yucong
2014-05-28 3:53 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2014-05-30 7:41 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.11.1405272037080.1126@eggly.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®