From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753316AbdA3NNS (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:13:18 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60045 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752025AbdA3NNK (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:13:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:10:37 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Kosina X-X-Sender: jkosina@pobox.suse.cz To: Laura Abbott cc: Matt Fleming , "x86@kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] EFI mixed mode patch triggers boot failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <7af87cde-ce79-d6e8-0797-54069a77f42b@redhat.com> <20161020120357.GB19876@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20170127223441.GJ31613@codeblueprint.co.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Laura Abbott wrote: > > > Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work. > > > There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test > > > with efi=old_map and secure boot off. > > > > FYI, you may want to ask the reporter to try out Jiri's patch if this > > is still an issue for them, > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.20.1701271638240.25515@cbobk.fhfr.pm > > > > Thanks! I pulled this into the latest Fedora update so I'll be asking > a couple of people to test. BTW where exactly is this tracked for Fedora, please? I'd like to get an idea how widespread this behavior is among different BIOS vendors. I've found https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238 is that the primary tracking bug on your side? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs