From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032296AbeBNQQl (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:16:41 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43282 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032074AbeBNQQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:16:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 17:16:37 +0100 (CET) From: Miroslav Benes To: Petr Mladek cc: Jiri Kosina , Josh Poimboeuf , Jason Baron , Joe Lawrence , Jessica Yu , Evgenii Shatokhin , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] livepatch: Atomic replace feature In-Reply-To: <20180206103424.10829-1-pmladek@suse.com> Message-ID: References: <20180206103424.10829-1-pmladek@suse.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Petr Mladek wrote: > The atomic replace allows to create cumulative patches. They > are useful when you maintain many livepatches and want to remove > one that is lower on the stack. In addition it is very useful when > more patches touch the same function and there are dependencies > between them. So I ported my old silly kgraft modules to livepatch and it works well. It does not say that much, because the tests are really simple stupid, but at least something. Miroslav