From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Dmitry Golovin <dima@golovin.in>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] objtool: Support Clang non-section symbols in ORC generation
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:58:20 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2004031057320.25955@pobox.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a9cae7fcf628843aabe5a086b1a3c5bf50f42e8.1585761021.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> When compiling the kernel with AS=clang, objtool produces a lot of
> warnings:
>
> warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .text
> warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .init.text
> warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .ref.text
>
> It then fails to generate the ORC table.
>
> The problem is that objtool assumes text section symbols always exist.
> But the Clang assembler is aggressive about removing them.
>
> When generating relocations for the ORC table, objtool always tries to
> reference instructions by their section symbol offset. If the section
> symbol doesn't exist, it bails.
>
> Do a fallback: when a section symbol isn't available, reference a
> function symbol instead.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/669
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Golovin <dima@golovin.in>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/objtool/orc_gen.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c b/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
> index 41e4a2754da4..4c0dabd28000 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
> @@ -88,11 +88,6 @@ static int create_orc_entry(struct elf *elf, struct section *u_sec, struct secti
> struct orc_entry *orc;
> struct rela *rela;
>
> - if (!insn_sec->sym) {
> - WARN("missing symbol for section %s", insn_sec->name);
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> /* populate ORC data */
> orc = (struct orc_entry *)u_sec->data->d_buf + idx;
> memcpy(orc, o, sizeof(*orc));
> @@ -105,8 +100,32 @@ static int create_orc_entry(struct elf *elf, struct section *u_sec, struct secti
> }
> memset(rela, 0, sizeof(*rela));
>
> - rela->sym = insn_sec->sym;
> - rela->addend = insn_off;
> + if (insn_sec->sym) {
> + rela->sym = insn_sec->sym;
> + rela->addend = insn_off;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * The Clang assembler doesn't produce section symbols, so we
> + * have to reference the function symbol instead:
> + */
> + rela->sym = find_symbol_containing(insn_sec, insn_off);
> + if (!rela->sym) {
> + /*
> + * Hack alert. This happens when we need to reference
> + * the NOP pad insn immediately after the function.
> + */
> + rela->sym = find_symbol_containing(insn_sec,
> + insn_off - 1);
> + }
I suppose there is always just one NOP pad insn, right? Anyway, it would
be better to get rid of it as you proposed.
> + if (!rela->sym) {
> + WARN("missing symbol for insn at offset 0x%lx\n",
> + insn_off);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + rela->addend = insn_off - rela->sym->offset;
> + }
> +
> rela->type = R_X86_64_PC32;
> rela->offset = idx * sizeof(int);
> rela->sec = ip_relasec;
Miroslav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-03 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-01 18:23 [PATCH 0/5] objtool fixes Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-01 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] objtool: Fix CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP unreachable warnings Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 7:30 ` Kees Cook
2020-04-14 10:34 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-01 18:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] objtool: Support Clang non-section symbols in ORC dump Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-14 10:34 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-01 18:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] objtool: Support Clang non-section symbols in ORC generation Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-01 18:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-01 19:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-01 19:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 8:58 ` Miroslav Benes [this message]
2020-04-03 14:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-14 10:34 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-01 18:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] objtool: Fix switch table detection in .text.unlikely Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-14 10:34 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-01 18:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] objtool: Make BP scratch register warning more robust Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-14 10:34 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 14:28 ` [PATCH 0/5] objtool fixes Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 9:00 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-04-09 13:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.21.2004031057320.25955@pobox.suse.cz \
--to=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=dima@golovin.in \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®