From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To: Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, raphael.gault@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Make check implementation arch agnostic
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:20:46 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2006101520150.26666@pobox.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200608152754.2483-1-jthierry@redhat.com>
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current implementation of the check subcommand has various x86 bits
> here and there. In order to prepare objtool to provide check for other
> architectures, add some abstraction over the x86 specific bits, relying
> on objtool arch specific code to provide some necessary operations.
>
> This is part of the effort to implement check for arm64, initiated [1]
> by Raphael. The series is based on top of the separation of check & orc
> subcommands series[2].
>
> I've push both series base on top of tip/objtool/core at [3].
>
> - The first two patches make it simpler for new arches to provide their
> list of kernel headers, without worrying about modifications in the x86
> headers.
> - Patch 3 Moves arch specific macros to more suitable location
> - Patches 4 and 5 add abstraction to handle alternatives
> - Patch 6 adds abstraction to handle jump table
> - Patch 7 abstracts the use of unwind hints. Adding it as RFC as I'm sure
> there's room for improvement.
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
for patches 1-6.
M
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-08 15:27 Julien Thierry
2020-06-08 15:27 ` [PATCH 1/7] objtool: Group headers to check in a single list Julien Thierry
2020-06-08 15:27 ` [PATCH 2/7] objtool: Make sync-check consider the target architecture Julien Thierry
2020-06-08 15:27 ` [PATCH 3/7] objtool: Move macros describing structures to arch-dependent code Julien Thierry
2020-06-08 15:27 ` [PATCH 4/7] objtool: Abstract alternative special case handling Julien Thierry
2020-06-08 15:27 ` [PATCH 5/7] objtool: Make relocation in alternative handling arch dependent Julien Thierry
2020-06-08 15:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] objtool: Refactor switch-tables code to support other architectures Julien Thierry
2020-06-08 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] objtool: Make unwind_hints available for all architectures Julien Thierry
2020-06-10 13:20 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-06-11 7:20 ` Julien Thierry
2020-06-10 13:20 ` Miroslav Benes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.21.2006101520150.26666@pobox.suse.cz \
--to=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raphael.gault@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®