mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Harry Hsu <x90613@gmail.com>,
	jpoimboe@kernel.org, joe.lawrence@redhat.com,  jikos@kernel.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	 song@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] livepatch: Clear relocations when klp_apply_object_relocs() fails
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 15:21:01 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2610271520030.28401@pobox.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <att3oHvCpVDjDt-h@pathway.suse.cz>

On Fri, 23 Oct 2026, Petr Mladek wrote:

> On Fri 2026-09-18 15:59:59, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Sep 2026, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 
> > > When a module is loaded, klp_module_coming() updates all enabled
> > > livepatches. If an error occurs, it delegates cleanup to
> > > klp_cleanup_module_patches_limited(). However, this cleanup loop skips
> > > the partially updated patch, leaving any changes made prior to failure
> > > unreverted.
> > > 
> > > One unhandled failure path occurs inside klp_apply_object_relocs(). On
> > > architectures like x86_64, apply_relocate_add() performs a verification
> > > step using memcmp() to check that memory contains the expected relocated
> > > or zeroed value. If relocations left behind by a failed patch are not
> > > cleared, subsequent patch operations or reloads can fail this validation.
> > > 
> > > Introduce klp_write_object_relocs_limited() to unwind and clear only the
> > > relocations that were successfully applied before klp_write_object_relocs()
> > > encountered an error.
> > > 
> > > There is no need to clear relocations for other objects in the failing
> > > patch because klp_module_coming() operates strictly on the specific
> > > module being loaded.
> > 
> > Hm, I spent some quite time on that and I am not sure if I deciphered 
> > everything correctly.
> > 
> > It seems to me that all error handling in those paths you are mentioning 
> > above is correct and the only problematic thing is that 
> > klp_apply_object_relocs() in klp_init_object_loaded() returns ret 
> > immediately which leaves partially applied relocations in case of an 
> > error. Following calls in klp_init_object_loaded() go through err: label 
> > where klp_free_object_loaded() is called which should be fine.
> > 
> > Is it correct?
> > 
> > Wouldn't be better to be somehow consistent and clean up right in the 
> > error path of klp_apply_object_relocs() call in klp_init_object_loaded() 
> > similarly to what is already there. After all we want to clean the object.
> 
> In fact, this is exactly what klp_write_object_relocs_limited() does.
> The new _limited() variant of the function is used just in two
> locations:
> 
>    1. It implements the original klp_write_object_relocs() where
>       it is called "unlimited".
> 
>    2. It is used recursively in its own error path.
> 
> I did this trick to avoid code duplication in the error path.
> 
> I agree that is is not obvious. I should mention it in the commit
> message. And probably even add a comment into the code.
> 
> Or would you prefer another solution, please?

I will admit that I do not understand what I meant back then. Your 
solution seems correct to me now.

Miroslav

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-27 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08 12:03 [PATCH v4 0/5] livepatch: Fail object initialization on duplicate patched function Petr Mladek
2026-09-08 12:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] " Petr Mladek
2026-09-08 12:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 13:02     ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-18 12:54       ` Miroslav Benes
2026-09-30 14:11         ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Harry Hsu
2026-10-01  4:32         ` [PATCH v4 1/5] " Harry Hsu
2026-10-23 14:17           ` Petr Mladek
2026-10-27 14:02             ` Miroslav Benes
2026-09-08 12:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] selftests/livepatch: Test rejection of aliased symbols in one object Petr Mladek
2026-09-18 13:40   ` Miroslav Benes
2026-09-08 12:03 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] livepatch: Move code for updating livepatch object relocations Petr Mladek
2026-09-18 13:40   ` Miroslav Benes
2026-09-08 12:03 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] livepatch: Clear relocations when klp_apply_object_relocs() fails Petr Mladek
2026-09-08 12:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 13:29     ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-18 13:59   ` Miroslav Benes
2026-09-18 14:05     ` Miroslav Benes
2026-10-23 15:05     ` Petr Mladek
2026-10-27 14:21       ` Miroslav Benes [this message]
2026-09-08 12:03 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] livepatch: Clean up klp_init_object_loaded() when fails Petr Mladek
2026-09-08 12:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 13:32     ` Petr Mladek
2026-09-18 14:07   ` Miroslav Benes
2026-10-23 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] livepatch: Fail object initialization on duplicate patched function Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.21.2610271520030.28401@pobox.suse.cz \
    --to=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=x90613@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®