mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hills <mark@pogo.org.uk>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: Appending '+' to version, since 2.6.35-rc2
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:38:27 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.01.1006140822080.28879@jrf.vwaro.pbz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100614065221.GB3999@x200>

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 08:01:26PM +0100, Mark Hills wrote:
> > Commit 85a256d adds a new feature:
> > 
> >   [...] When CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is not enabled, a `+' is appended
> >   to the kernel version to represent that the kernel has been revised
> >   since the last release unless "make LOCALVERSION=" was used to uniquely
> >   identify the build.
> > 
> > I'm finding this inconvenient for 'casual' kernel development.
> > 
> > For example, my usual workflow goes something like:
> > 
> > 1) find something I suspect is a bug
> > 2) upgrade to the latest stable or -rc kernel, to confirm
> > 3) experiment with patch to fix it
> > 
> > Since 2.6.35-rc2, going from step 2 to 3 causes the version of the kernel 
> > to change: forcing time-consuming rebuilds,
> 
> init/version.c
> kernel/configs.c
> + whatever patch has changed
> + vmlinux 2 or 3 times
> 
> That's not time consuming.

There is also the modpost step, which is most time consuming.

> 
> > installing modules, and manual 
> > changes associated with a new version number; eg. updating the lilo/grub 
> > config, or the distribution's initrd.
> 

-- 
Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-14  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-13 19:01 Mark Hills
2010-06-14  6:52 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-06-14  7:38   ` Mark Hills [this message]
2010-06-15 13:48 ` Benny Halevy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.NEB.2.01.1006140822080.28879@jrf.vwaro.pbz \
    --to=mark@pogo.org.uk \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®