From: Hisashi T Fujinaka <htodd@twofifty.com>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
linux.nics@intel.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
bruce.w.allan@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.ronciak@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrej Manduch <amanduch@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] net:ethernet:intel:Remove outdated fix me comment in the function, gb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:03:54 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.11.1502090901440.395@chris.i8u.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87egpzqvpc.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Bj?rn Mork wrote:
> Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> writes:
>
>> If you want to see Nick's patch, feel free to view his patch on
>> my queue tree:
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/queue.git/
>
> which said:
> - s32 i = 0, timeout = 200; /* FIXME: find real value to use here */
> + s32 i = 0, timeout = 200;
>
>
> Comments like the one deleted by that patch do have some value in my
> opinion: They document that the constant is chosen arbitrarily and is
> not taken from some datasheet.
>
> Not a big deal, but leaving such comments, even if the value never ever
> changes, could save someone from trying to figure out where the heck you
> got that constant. And there's noone actually misinterpreting this
> comment as "something needs to be fixed here", is there? So the cost of
> leaving the comment is exactly zero.
>
> Just my .02 ?. I'm not going to tell you how to maintain your driver,
> of course. At least I try not to :-)
I think, for now, we should NAK this. It's a short comment and you don't
want me to replace it with a philosophical statement on how you could
tune the timeout. That's what the data sheet is for.
(Replying from my home account and not my work account -
todd.fujinaka@intel.com)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-09 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1423372910-29183-1-git-send-email-xerofoify@gmail.com>
2015-02-09 1:21 ` [PATCH] net:ethernet:intel:Remove outdated fix me comment in the function,gb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210 Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-09 1:26 ` [E1000-devel] [PATCH] net:ethernet:intel:Remove outdated fix me comment in the function, gb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210 Jeff Kirsher
[not found] ` <54D80D38.3080708@gmail.com>
2015-02-09 1:29 ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-09 7:17 ` [PATCH] net:ethernet:intel:Remove outdated fix me comment in the function,gb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210 Andrej Manduch
2015-02-09 8:32 ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-09 9:29 ` Bjørn Mork
2015-02-09 9:35 ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-09 17:03 ` Hisashi T Fujinaka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.NEB.2.11.1502090901440.395@chris.i8u.org \
--to=htodd@twofifty.com \
--cc=amanduch@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.nics@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®