From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932159Ab0BOVTI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:19:08 -0500 Received: from smtp2.it.da.ut.ee ([193.40.5.67]:57260 "EHLO smtp2.it.da.ut.ee" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932089Ab0BOVTG (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:19:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:19:05 +0200 (EET) From: Meelis Roos To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Linux Kernel list , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc8 regression: irq11: nobody cared, during yenta registration In-Reply-To: <201002152048.59832.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: References: <201002150018.21417.rjw@sisk.pl> <201002152048.59832.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (SOC 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > I have created the Bugzilla entry at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15307 > > > for your report. > > > > > > Peter, Ingo, did we do anything to the interrupt handling between .33-rc5 and .33-rc8? > > > > I just retested it and the problem appears even in -rc5 (missed it > > before). Come to think of it, I only tested -rc5 out of dock before. > > > > With dock, the problem is there in 2.6.33-rc4-00399-g24bc734. > > > > Without dock, even -rc8 is OK, so it only happens docked. > > > > Will try to bisect but this takes time because I'm rarely near that > > computer. It's even worse - or my memory is, actually. With dock, both 2.6.32 and 2.6.31 exhibit the problem, so it's not a recent regression - but the bugzilla entry still holds. In fact, googling tells that I reported the issue back in 2006 together with a USB problem that I thought was related, and that has been fixed meanwhile: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0607.2/1331.html Strange that I haven't noticed it meanwhile. -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)