From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D395D40860B; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784902463; cv=none; b=oa/H0k+ZHM8cZMNbnMuxDQT1P3U4xSihaZOPJttWt8TIcnV82iCJVYyKMeYm9ccvZIImUDK9fS64zXeSh1+tBv40i7rR4UiAwq/IeUroUXFcsPX9RidD0P6Qxtw7Go1ujQT1iqEnGaFgQMCYhrOrZHMJvy5hbwLUSVf2BD6JYfw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784902463; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ruN4HRMRiA/tyx/52QmIhzZu8BUYUZZIoI2bKpg1hUU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KbUyaE0AgoRmAkmwz/wwHowAIx1B69cOckr937+qlk1vdvKZHKU85+JAGeYSvQOfFHqWZW1PabydmvltsMgdktbTCEpkOLzJ7f/7nRmEjBO2jJV8vz3gG0+KsPx3hbtJsh+71aeO8H7b5WIuQbdV9IvZMAEdvBerHkQ7Cdh5eOo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=b3FaE/15; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="b3FaE/15" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=sqQq2Owm1obwOGEA9eotW/m1MLzuoJQfAmp5HBaVcd8=; b=b3FaE/15gGHycdVRSEH7kk8gXg ziED/cLtyY3G9U83si7GAn5Ol84senjYN1m4jLjO0UtBZIPJDA8wUFOchOARYzauL2VUm0k7nZpzN K07SPvCGF24b8xDHwesu9/XXFOC/xHyVYN0uSucmDm+HCF3RUQvxf7WqMkuuVnzM1qoNRsMjxDcj9 uhiGquYmGmqrNAnYWz2mPt+rVVhLzVIZYA3vpLT1TxNs0sooD2gummR7OMhrl7SLQIfux9q544RXB 8pK5bJXka726CjSXoWptNMLW0fFoYyvvcYKrkavP6fm72xKjr3YlkbnKKrHXHEs0HDQz3K+4Q60X8 AYR/0EFw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wnGf7-00000003fU1-11AE; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:14:05 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:14:05 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Usama Arif Cc: Pedro Falcato , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Jan Kara , Zi Yan , Baolin Wang , Nico Pache , Ryan Roberts , Dev Jain , Barry Song , Lance Yang , Kevin Brodsky , Muhammad Usama Anjum , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/parisc: constify ptep_get() argument Message-ID: References: <20260724102017.141532-1-pfalcato@suse.de> <20260724102017.141532-4-pfalcato@suse.de> <0fd713a8-e4ab-4c07-b36e-79dd138b4a86@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0fd713a8-e4ab-4c07-b36e-79dd138b4a86@linux.dev> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote: > > > On 24/07/2026 11:20, Pedro Falcato wrote: > > ptep_get() does not need write access to the PTE. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato > > --- > > arch/parisc/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > hmm I think you might break build bisectibility if > you separate out the patches, you should squash patch 3 and 4, > with patch 1. I don't see how this breaks bisectability. Can you elaborate on what you think would break?