mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: "Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <david@davidgow.net>, Rae Moar <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Pascal EBERHARD <pascal.eberhard@se.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] clk: tests: Add clk_parse_clkspec() Kunit testing
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:16:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amOsAUZN2iP7DYbB@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717-schneider-v7-2-rc1-eip201-upstream-v4-2-751547e160e5@bootlin.com>

On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 05:59:18PM +0200, Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric) wrote:
> Create a new set of kunit tests to make sure clk_parse_clkspec() is
> working as expected. We currently verify if we get a proper device when
> using indexes and names. If we make an out of bounds request we expect
> an error.
>
> For testing purposes, we must ensure of_clk_get_hw()'s symbol is
> exported.
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric) <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>

>  drivers/clk/Makefile                     |   1 +
>  drivers/clk/clk.c                        |   2 +
>  drivers/clk/clk_test.c                   | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/kunit_clk_parse_clkspec.dtso |  21 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> index cc108a75a900..035b984db70d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ clk-test-y			:= clk_test.o \
>  				   kunit_clk_assigned_rates_zero.dtbo.o \
>  				   kunit_clk_assigned_rates_zero_consumer.dtbo.o \
>  				   kunit_clk_hw_get_dev_of_node.dtbo.o \
> +				   kunit_clk_parse_clkspec.dtbo.o \
>  				   kunit_clk_parent_data_test.dtbo.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk-divider.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk-fixed-factor.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 048adfa86a5d..08874cf9b561 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/stringhash.h>
> +#include <kunit/visibility.h>
>
>  #include "clk.h"
>
> @@ -5300,6 +5301,7 @@ struct clk_hw *of_clk_get_hw(struct device_node *np, int index,
>
>  	return hw;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(of_clk_get_hw);
>
>  static struct clk *__of_clk_get(struct device_node *np,
>  				int index, const char *dev_id,
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
> index b1961daac5e2..f47f81b7d72a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
> @@ -3541,10 +3541,119 @@ static struct kunit_suite clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_test_suite = {
>  	.test_cases = clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_test_cases,
>  };
>
> +static const struct clk_init_data clk_parse_clkspec_1_init_data = {
> +	.name = "clk_parse_clkspec_1",
> +	.ops = &empty_clk_ops,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_init_data clk_parse_clkspec_2_init_data = {
> +	.name = "clk_parse_clkspec_2",
> +	.ops = &empty_clk_ops,
> +};
> +
> +struct clk_parse_clkspec_ctx {
> +	struct device_node *cons_np;
> +};
> +
> +static int clk_parse_clkspec_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *prov1_np, *prov2_np;
> +	struct clk_parse_clkspec_ctx *ctx;
> +	struct clk_hw *hw1, *hw2;
> +
> +	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
> +	test->priv = ctx;
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_clk_parse_clkspec));
> +
> +	/* Register provider 1 */
> +	hw1 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*hw1), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw1);
> +	hw1->init = &clk_parse_clkspec_1_init_data;
> +
> +	prov1_np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "test,clock-provider1");
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, prov1_np);
> +	of_node_put_kunit(test, prov1_np);
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_clk_hw_register_kunit(test, prov1_np, hw1));
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_clk_add_hw_provider_kunit(test, prov1_np, of_clk_hw_simple_get, hw1));
> +
> +	/* Register provider 2 */
> +	hw2 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*hw2), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw2);
> +	hw2->init = &clk_parse_clkspec_2_init_data;
> +
> +	prov2_np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "test,clock-provider2");
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, prov2_np);
> +	of_node_put_kunit(test, prov2_np);
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_clk_hw_register_kunit(test, prov2_np, hw2));
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, of_clk_add_hw_provider_kunit(test, prov2_np, of_clk_hw_simple_get, hw2));
> +
> +	ctx->cons_np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "test,clock-consumer");
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ctx->cons_np);
> +	of_node_put_kunit(test, ctx->cons_np);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Test DT phandle lookups using correct index or name succeed */
> +static void clk_parse_clkspec_with_correct_index_and_name(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct clk_parse_clkspec_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct clk_hw *hw1, *hw2, *hw3, *hw4;
> +
> +	/* Get clocks by index */
> +	hw1 = of_clk_get_hw(ctx->cons_np, 0, NULL);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw1);
> +
> +	hw2 = of_clk_get_hw(ctx->cons_np, 1, NULL);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw2);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, hw1, hw2);
> +
> +	/* Get clocks by name */
> +	hw3 = of_clk_get_hw(ctx->cons_np, 0, "first_clock");
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw3);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, hw1, hw3);
> +
> +	hw4 = of_clk_get_hw(ctx->cons_np, 0, "second_clock");
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw4);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, hw2, hw4);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test DT phandle lookups using wrong index or name fail */
> +static void clk_parse_clkspec_with_incorrect_index_and_name(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct clk_parse_clkspec_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct clk_hw *hw;
> +
> +	/* Get clock by index */
> +	hw = of_clk_get_hw(ctx->cons_np, 2, NULL);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, IS_ERR(hw));
> +
> +	/* Get clock by name */
> +	hw = of_clk_get_hw(ctx->cons_np, 0, "third_clock");
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, IS_ERR(hw));
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case clk_parse_clkspec_test_cases[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(clk_parse_clkspec_with_correct_index_and_name),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(clk_parse_clkspec_with_incorrect_index_and_name),
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +/* Test suite to verify clk_parse_clkspec() */
> +static struct kunit_suite clk_parse_clkspec_test_suite = {
> +	.name = "clk_parse_clkspec",
> +	.init = clk_parse_clkspec_init,
> +	.test_cases = clk_parse_clkspec_test_cases,
> +};
>
>  kunit_test_suites(
>  	&clk_assigned_rates_suite,
>  	&clk_hw_get_dev_of_node_test_suite,
> +	&clk_parse_clkspec_test_suite,
>  	&clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_suite,
>  	&clk_test_suite,
>  	&clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_suite,
> @@ -3562,4 +3671,5 @@ kunit_test_suites(
>  	&clk_uncached_test_suite,
>  );
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Kunit tests for clk framework");
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/kunit_clk_parse_clkspec.dtso b/drivers/clk/kunit_clk_parse_clkspec.dtso
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c93feb93e101
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/kunit_clk_parse_clkspec.dtso
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/plugin/;
> +
> +&{/} {
> +	kunit_clock_provider1: kunit-clock-provider1 {
> +		compatible = "test,clock-provider1";
> +		#clock-cells = <1>;
> +	};
> +
> +	kunit_clock_provider2: kunit-clock-provider2 {
> +		compatible = "test,clock-provider2";
> +		#clock-cells = <1>;
> +	};
> +
> +	kunit-clock-consumer {
> +		compatible = "test,clock-consumer";
> +		clocks = <&kunit_clock_provider1 0>, <&kunit_clock_provider2 0>;
> +		clock-names = "first_clock", "second_clock";
> +	};
> +};
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 15:59 [PATCH v4 0/7] clk: Add support for clock nexus Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: Introduce nexus nodes Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-07-22 19:34   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-07-24 18:14   ` Frank Li
2026-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] clk: tests: Add clk_parse_clkspec() Kunit testing Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-07-21 22:27   ` Brian Masney
2026-07-24 18:16   ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] clk: tests: Add Kunit testing for of_clk_get_parent_name() Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-07-21 22:28   ` Brian Masney
2026-07-24 18:19   ` Frank Li
2026-08-07 12:23     ` Miquel Raynal
2026-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] clk: Improve a couple of comments Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] clk: Use the generic OF phandle parsing in only one place Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-07-24 18:35   ` Frank Li
2026-08-07 13:08     ` Miquel Raynal
2026-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] clk: Add support for clock nexus dt bindings Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-07-24 18:30   ` Frank Li
2026-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] clk: tests: Add Kunit testing for nexus nodes Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric)
2026-07-21 22:32   ` Brian Masney
2026-08-07 12:50     ` Miquel Raynal
2026-07-24 18:31   ` Frank Li
2026-07-24 18:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] clk: Add support for clock nexus Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amOsAUZN2iP7DYbB@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@davidgow.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=pascal.eberhard@se.com \
    --cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®