On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 08:56:12PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 11/09/2025 18:27, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 08:50:58AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > > SOCTHERM is thermal sensor and thermal throttling controller found in Tegra > > > SoC starting from Tegra114. Existing Tegra124 setup is mostly compatible > > > with Tegra114 and needs only a few slight adjustmets of fuse calibration > > > process. > > > > > > --- > > > Changes in v2: > > > - no changes, resend. > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > - expanded desciption of "thermal: tegra: soctherm-fuse: parametrize > > > configuration further" commit > > > - changes title of "thermal: tegra: soctherm-fuse: parametrize > > > configuration further" to "thermal: tegra: soctherm-fuse: prepare > > > calibration for Tegra114 support" > > > - Tegra11x > Tegra114 and Tegra12x > Tegra124 > > > - ft and cp shift bits dropped > > > - clarified tegra114 precision > > > - lower_precision > use_lower_precision > > > - nominal calibration ft and cp hardcoded into SoC specific structures > > > - added tegra114-soctherm header into dt-bindings > > > > > > Changes in v4: > > > - fixed Tegra124/132/210 cp mask > > > - dropped TEGRA114_SOCTHERM_SENSOR_NUM from header > > > - TEGRA_SOCTHERM_THROT_LEVEL_ made SoC specific > > > - adjusted soctherm node and inclusions in tegra114.dtsi > > > - dropped use_lower_presision and nominal_calib_cp options > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > - fixed CPU and GPU hotspot offset values > > > - added static_assert()s to assert the TEGRA114_* and TEGRA124_* > > > counterparts are equal > > > --- > > > > > > Svyatoslav Ryhel (6): > > > soc: tegra: fuse: add Tegra114 nvmem cells and fuse lookups > > > dt-bindings: thermal: Document Tegra114 SOCTHERM Thermal Management > > > System > > > thermal: tegra: soctherm-fuse: prepare calibration for Tegra114 > > > support > > > dt-bindings: thermal: add Tegra114 soctherm header > > > thermal: tegra: add Tegra114 specific SOCTHERM driver > > > ARM: tegra: Add SOCTHERM support on Tegra114 > > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > there's a build-time dependency on patch 4 in both patches 5 and 6. Do > > you want to pick up patches 2-5 from this series and I pick up patch 1 > > and hold off on applying patch 6 until after the merge window? We could > > also do a shared branch, but it may not be worth the extra hassle. > > I can take the patches 2-5. Regarding a shared branch or wait for the next > version, I would prefer the latter Alright, let's do it that way. I've picked up patch 1. If you take patches 2-5 now I'll pick up patch 6 once v6.18-rc1 has released. Thanks, Thierry