mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	 Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	 Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] e1000e: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO access by validating BAR0 size
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 02:42:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amcn2lVGnmxwvsVr@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727025645.2600363-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>

On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 02:56:45AM +0000, Pu Lehui wrote:
> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
> 
> Syzkaller reported a kernel panic caused by an out-of-bounds MMIO
> access in the e1000e driver.
> 
> [   82.868719][  T404] e1000e 0000:00:02.0: The NVM Checksum Is Not Valid
> [   82.872328][  T404] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80008894e090
> [   83.085218][  T404] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 404 Comm: bash Not tainted 7.2.0-rc2-g3f1f75536668 #1 PREEMPTLAZY
> [   83.129013][  T404] pc : e1000_get_cfg_done_82571+0x70/0x158
> [   83.140092][  T404] lr : e1000_get_cfg_done_82571+0x68/0x158
> [   83.151196][  T404] sp : ffff80008ac37410
> [   83.158922][  T404] x29: ffff80008ac37410 x28: ffff0000cd6a11b8 x27: ffff0000c58190d0
> [   83.173919][  T404] x26: ffff0000cd6a11b8 x25: ffff0000cd6a0bc0 x24: ffff0000cd6a0000
> [   83.189417][  T404] x23: 0000000000001010 x22: ffff0000cd6a11c0 x21: ffff0000cd6a11b8
> [   83.205195][  T404] x20: 0000000000000064 x19: ffff80008894e090 x18: 0000000000000000
> [   83.220545][  T404] x17: ffff800081c1a3f4 x16: ffff800081c19c10 x15: ffff800081e86510
> [   83.235764][  T404] x14: 0000000000000001 x13: 0000000000000001 x12: ffff60001bc8a8b3
> [   83.251301][  T404] x11: 1fffe0001bc8a8b2 x10: ffff60001bc8a8b2 x9 : ffff800081eae25c
> [   83.266705][  T404] x8 : 00009fffe437574e x7 : ffff0000de454593 x6 : 0000000000000001
> [   83.281919][  T404] x5 : ffff0000cf2b9640 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : dfff800000000000
> [   83.297317][  T404] x2 : 0000000000000007 x1 : ffff0000cd6a11c0 x0 : 0000000000000000
> [   83.312601][  T404] Call trace:
> [   83.318662][  T404]  e1000_get_cfg_done_82571+0x70/0x158 (P)
> [   83.329748][  T404]  e1000e_phy_hw_reset_generic+0x17c/0x1a8
> [   83.341541][  T404]  e1000_probe+0xbd8/0x1988
> [   83.350334][  T404]  local_pci_probe+0x84/0x130
> 
> Repetition steps:
> 1. Find PCI device which BAR0 size <= 4K. If it's:
>    Device Addr: 0000:00:02.0   BAR0 SIZE: 4K
>    Vendor/Device ID: 0x1af4 0x1004
> 2. Unbind the above PCI device
>    echo '0000:00:02.0' > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:02.0/driver/unbind
> 3. Set the above device to e1000e new_id
>    echo '1af4 1004' > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/e1000e/new_id
> 
> During e1000_probe(), the driver maps the device's BAR0 memory region.
> If the device has a 4K BAR0, ioremap() maps only 4K of space. Later in
> the probe process, when the NVM checksum validation fails, the driver
> attempts to perform a hardware reset and falls back to the err_eeprom
> cleanup path.
> 
> This cleanup path will trigger an OOB access kernel panic:
> e1000_phy_hw_reset
>   e1000e_phy_hw_reset_generic
>     e1000_get_cfg_done_82571
>       er32(EEMNGCTL)
>         readl(hw->hw_addr + EEMNGCTL); <-- EEMNGCTL(0x1010) > 4K, OOB access
> 
> Fix this by verifying that the MMIO length (pci_resource_len(pdev, 0))
> is at least SZ_64K before calling ioremap(). This accounts not only for
> standard registers up to E1000_SYSSTMPH, but also for flash registers
> mapped on ICH/PCH chipsets (up to offset 0xE074 / ~57.1 KB). Since PCI
> BAR sizes are power-of-two aligned, SZ_64K is the minimum valid BAR0
> size required to ensure all subsequent MMIO accesses remain strictly
> within the mapped boundary.
> 
> Fixes: bc7f75fa9788 ("[E1000E]: New pci-express e1000 driver (currently for ICH9 devices only)")
> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-27  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-27  2:56 Pu Lehui
2026-07-27  9:42 ` Breno Leitao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amcn2lVGnmxwvsVr@gmail.com \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
    --cc=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome