From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56423F822B; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785147744; cv=none; b=e9sRrJ8YrLLrc+0poIfdUEzN1tW4sDQ7giyE4LcW7d+nsccOGeyDa3H+WGcpa2HRl4msPHgEcczNRxC0eLwl7xnA+vO1hIIIWWU4dBUZ4n65J2nlmE5zwUeZpscuN5u3QytK77i1Cn3R47sdSFpx/osAe373n5H/infRsTD1jK4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785147744; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iiLJNHU6xEHzqqi/KV52NPqARYyozF5uapPv9GfdchM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iOtykk259eHmRbST2/ka8cRfqA83OKne3PB8tEZsDeBS8LGSEreaho+z0uqUVRp1A9KhUAtfPRRSJMs0U36zM5zFjgLb99VqNa7wgf9mu1M0yY4MugO9lZDOZvqji+sAdG3OxSlzzOmX/0HMZ1RARbMoDa6xkINhLJqoLWmeFms= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gsYY3yMs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gsYY3yMs" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5E151F000E9; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:22:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785147743; bh=/JnmBgXxFDtCMN2wDB2IoufqkaTKn0f8mfPW/klL5BI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=gsYY3yMsnWmKGvnXvXG4cAJ9uYD/g70GCEZQyJYYALUaBP30DL0mK8UiL1pB/EbhK nc+d8D//BvpV+fsOKUHm9FDZGks+LTCZNNnpygfauGfGDeviZ7a4Gqo4kdtWxeck/h N5qCMmAK1Dz1wbvXTixVEc38OGcBuCgNrMt0sN0dX9WpHNIOzTARNfgEcid/hOxfeT 3z4xkHMzT2u5IB1Guj2HJz8xjNhJ7A/m+YluYaX2fPMRcTaMbRpym80eUIvDHQmf4G ID4MUbBHhJPHP/6PWnOj7KYtY4zzJo2RU/OQ8P+F7MVjo8Q1DldhHmb47Hgfz1kxZd WoAIbmR4uVBoA== Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 13:22:09 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Dave Hansen Cc: Borislav Petkov , linux-mm@kvack.org, Albert Ou , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Brendan Jackman , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , Huacai Chen , Ingo Molnar , Ingo Molnar , Kevin Brodsky , "Liam R. Howlett" , Lorenzo Stoakes , Michal Hocko , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" , Suren Baghdasaryan , Thomas Gleixner , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/18] arch, mm: create a generic set_memory/change_page_attr core Message-ID: References: <20260721-generic-set-memory-v0-1-v1-0-2c1fc62306b3@kernel.org> <20260721171943.GEal-qLx4p5YbocQNV@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 10:03:03AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 7/21/26 10:19, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 07:23:23PM +0300, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote: > >> Currently there are 6 independent implementations for set_memory and > >> set_direct_map APIs. > > So with all mm/x86/CPA patches flying around, can we first agree on which tree > > is going to collect everything? > > > > And if I want to review patches in that area, what am I applying it ontop? > > linux-next perhaps... > > > > Let's sort out the workflow first so that we don't get lost on fruitless bug > > chases and fingerpointing. > > Just practically, I think this series needs to be ignored for a bit. Bug > fixes first, features and cleanups second. Ignored is a bit strong, I'd still love to get feedback on the concept. > When the time is right, it probably needs to get get acks from all the > affected architectures and go through mm. Folks can ack it now, but I > don't think anyone should even consider merging it until ~7.3-rc1. FWIF, I didn't plan to send non-RFC version before 7.3-rc1. -- Sincerely yours, Mike.