From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f54.google.com (mail-pj1-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 158E21F942 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 04:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785298984; cv=none; b=u6jx5mhcTva3IDyRtdDtmpsoUP0VDHD/DfWo18UJHRwYR2xVvp/rbX+ehz8IOdN2WDmlJe9ULdTqxFeDNcQO8FLR8jy8ThcU6SEoN6OJ7hmN9ucqjlvxEcUPxOHDU28bXm9H72guWopapB9RihXKt6m15LjOYeyxVNPNN08x9c4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785298984; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PLTR4EXpxcF2cWVOgYXJ6zBxJeCnM5K6x5xa2NAh9gM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=e5RKM3z+LnOb7z3kLPnvD25SeCG4i1GHAlTxFiJFn1vatIKu8gwUZ5YILx1z1dGAuFoQBBiRKBSD9w4ngzFZwjA47oy97kUTpCRL+qaWxsXno40vZ1mgwoIFH6/XBGIjb+iiaMiELSKl4HANo7RP5o3NZD1hVxc998uLuHolqI0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=j3MyIfVH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="j3MyIfVH" Received: by mail-pj1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-38759bcd877so517878a91.2 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:23:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1785298982; x=1785903782; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=98kWooReTYS/Hw3LVutl5nhi/UI1GUChmjWWNJfzP20=; b=j3MyIfVH/EwsDZzJwcQOpCCdLVICVc0olj3O7CeRgmSJjsCsgT9c1Y9r93VIf1V0qE NRK7JwVi0ZfL2V5fmoKhjHtrUGWExVb6/OilsLsp1eTZqykAQ6m5lRCMjaN81g0qz0QY s7qhq3kqbwlUMUevVFxE6EnT4gU4ejA+KnfDQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1785298982; x=1785903782; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=98kWooReTYS/Hw3LVutl5nhi/UI1GUChmjWWNJfzP20=; b=ae0kxDVoPZvM5rOQvOm+wCZipHYmoxh3DcxugK9AEazThqZNerEGdeE9aiNgwj6Iqt 4IJjlkAhuml3vUY1Uedy15EIY4OkAgAZ3heQtRDuCZwxoYaZS8PkKgzwJJadeK8xDr8i FmQa2ng4btKN6Pt9Dsdn/dsNZGgqDG3faBKVpGAkxEibMNYJeU/55ZiXi+s74qdxYxl1 y7N5hws0bSOPoFOWyDbCfKLzGpSwpYMn+kajGTh2jNwUk2IAmTyarSKf6Ya/GfF17DJ/ WzVN09c4ZUBtt0Ke/dYeOiorMwqx/mnhPynnxlji+Jq6EFU+0snUrBMjw3blM7NI2JUX ZNGA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RoPXlSdhULy+jse6IjwFxHYuOsID+oi2nBR7d+GQTJbWjx/AREumrianP6Vdea9u01NFUxH0wkP6GepgIM=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwB6YE2WLEWx5s20N8H5cTtIWj4xGaWuQKVcTZax33pLDj/hphu 5ZnihsNaL9E0iOQywVGgn1dfE05ifDc+tlpifxHtal3Ay3axtnB3ZE2JnZfDOE0cWw== X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD11XBEXTMkVeUSdX3CepL448EGWBvXvN/35QOy519laWNNw8ICwXvYJ7xM3OIX3 bunC8bNmHgcZgs/ZsaCuvU3nbd/WiQqOpCW9WdQte46jzLTcCGD9JsBuPXptvGBM2hLRDYTZmMn tgycPfhOqZfZrtvDKj9tw5L3PBQKObF1kvLq8RLdCY30+aDC9s3/5n4YHqh9fRKa2cLVYsctLvW ozu/W/3/BT4BhL8c7cF1I8LTUChag9DklFpj4ucQFwvjixQSihsbx/82r9+NTbyBnKQD7MzXEcO 1yxxesFu2VLuGyjcfyldZlZEsKF2PMTxxZwVqBVFdkda9VQim08xJHSJSuZoNGjeRt8Kn0G1c2u 89bdfjYY6eltDFpHvaHmGG4vrzpZU+CbQ55U3Oiw6QWbtQ9sTRa1cbcO30K6EW1U3E5ngF/cOEz sdiWlaTUetWqYCW8gJfctV910lJvhUxAy6WxacS9vivpaO3UVRzVGkZkVb38SV+I4H0Yxem9ITp otBoSrNulqD1ze7aCOFJI/lZoitzoH53LaXKyI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4c42:b0:38e:a555:8fc3 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-38f6a484cf7mr5395408a91.41.1785298982331; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2a00:79e0:2031:6:65c1:52a3:f6d3:37dc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-38f7f0ed140sm723275a91.1.2026.07.28.21.22.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:22:57 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: haoqin huang Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Minchan Kim , Jens Axboe , Nick Terrell , David Sterba , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Haoqin Huang , Rongwei Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] zstd: move ZSTD_MAX_CLEVEL to zstd_lib.h Message-ID: References: <20260627070216.13511-1-haoqinhuang7@gmail.com> <20260728092935.31139-1-haoqinhuang7@gmail.com> <20260728092935.31139-3-haoqinhuang7@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On (26/07/29 12:16), haoqin huang wrote: > > On (26/07/28 17:29), Haoqin Huang wrote: > > [..] > > > #define ZSTD_MINMATCH_MAX 7 /* only for ZSTD_fast, other strategies are limited to 6 */ > > > #define ZSTD_MINMATCH_MIN 3 /* only for ZSTD_btopt+, faster strategies are limited to 4 */ > > > +#define ZSTD_MAX_CLEVEL 22 > > > #define ZSTD_TARGETLENGTH_MAX ZSTD_BLOCKSIZE_MAX > > > #define ZSTD_TARGETLENGTH_MIN 0 /* note : comparing this constant to an unsigned results in a tautological test */ > > > #define ZSTD_STRATEGY_MIN ZSTD_fast > > > diff --git a/lib/zstd/compress/clevels.h b/lib/zstd/compress/clevels.h > > > index 6ab8be6532ef..06565e064456 100644 > > > --- a/lib/zstd/compress/clevels.h > > > +++ b/lib/zstd/compress/clevels.h > > > @@ -17,8 +17,6 @@ > > > > > > /*-===== Pre-defined compression levels =====-*/ > > > > > > -#define ZSTD_MAX_CLEVEL 22 > > > - > > > __attribute__((__unused__)) > > > > Sashiko made a good point. Can we use zstd_max_clevel() instead? > > Good point, I'll drop this patch and use zstd_max_clevel() instead > in v3. > > Since it's a runtime function and can't be used for static struct > initialization, I plan to set backend_zstd's level_max to -1 as a > sentinel value, and query the actual maximum in > zcomp_validate_params(): > > s32 max = backend->level_max; > if (max < 0) > max = zstd_max_clevel(); > > Do you think this approach is feasible? Hmm, no, that doesn't look good. zcomp should not include zstd.h or any other libs directly. Should params validation be a per-backend callback then?