From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFB94399FF for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 15:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785424137; cv=none; b=eC2JmPHsKoDC5qRifajt3ANSE+6xogTim+w3QUeVrDMHLUGom1QhJZZM6CfTLCd/3RbyVkYj6OHAwB3TzIPVrS5rJnPL5ReEgXwKy9AdO0Oh3RMZh8CkSRzESsVGeNwldhnh0VQJhi7dQjhx/qUslnAQzhzmd8P6/HRur/tbwlk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785424137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fm4PjR752KJiisTfelUMEAqvjekxRc5KLt39VpvDn60=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=T2cdbr1V8AgIsMOeUuO6GUxATiEeEgOfIBm28s/64d1u0dtG1DUapU8gxyCdxtatqd4pZBgtdlomnZv80QEvGjG7eH3oa5Mnjf+wLmaOrPp/SEzjSMu6feg0ZXk5cwrKBZJ8Auv9rafzgVnmHxqIIwGCxH79Gh3gvSiBdO6bo2I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=uKAkcRXr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="uKAkcRXr" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06F9204C for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.11.34] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9EFB73F7B4 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:08:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1785424134; bh=fm4PjR752KJiisTfelUMEAqvjekxRc5KLt39VpvDn60=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uKAkcRXrbXFuqiGORYiizLwzpnRm+NtkfcewuQTIsYuL6nc6T/ltNaEtmkilg+NbY dsyiPX+tTm7Hf+8X1HGiOwpeo9vM+yjJLm8usokwxu2Phe7I1MhviNhAPZe9oRVH+I 334t+YOahxMcs9hUrlCLFbpodJzjGpyLoYv8oUBI= Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:08:29 +0100 From: Liviu Dudau To: Nicolas Frattaroli Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , K Prateek Nayak , Boris Brezillon , Steven Price , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Grant Likely , Heiko Stuebner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel@collabora.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] wait: Introduce non-irq variants of wait_event_lock_timeout Message-ID: References: <20260730-panthor-cache-flush-fix-v2-0-28790478bfff@collabora.com> <20260730-panthor-cache-flush-fix-v2-1-28790478bfff@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260730-panthor-cache-flush-fix-v2-1-28790478bfff@collabora.com> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 01:45:14PM +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote: > For locks that are never acquired in an interrupt context, the non-irq > variants for spin_lock()/spin_unlock() are more efficient. However, so > far, wait.h only provided wait_event_lock_irq_timeout and > wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout, both of which use > spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq(). > > Rectify this by adding new non-irq variants of these two macros. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau Best regards, Liviu > --- > include/linux/wait.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h > index dce055e6add3..cd9b989c120e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/wait.h > +++ b/include/linux/wait.h > @@ -1174,6 +1174,13 @@ do { \ > __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret); \ > spin_lock_irq(&lock)); > > +#define __wait_event_lock_timeout(wq_head, condition, lock, timeout, state) \ > + ___wait_event(wq_head, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition), \ > + state, 0, timeout, \ > + spin_unlock(&lock); \ > + __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret); \ > + spin_lock(&lock)) > + > /** > * wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout - sleep until a condition gets > * true or a timeout elapses. The condition is checked under > @@ -1219,6 +1226,83 @@ do { \ > __ret; \ > }) > > +/** > + * wait_event_interruptible_lock_timeout - sleep until a condition gets > + * true or a timeout elapses. The condition is checked under > + * the lock with IRQs enabled. This is expected to be called > + * with the lock taken. > + * @wq_head: the waitqueue to wait on > + * @condition: a C expression for the event to wait for > + * @lock: a spinlock_t that has been locked with spin_lock(), which will be > + * released before schedule() and reacquired afterwards. > + * @timeout: timeout, in jiffies > + * > + * The process is put to sleep (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) until the > + * @condition evaluates to true or signal is received. The @condition is > + * checked each time the waitqueue @wq_head is woken up. > + * > + * wake_up() has to be called after changing any variable that could > + * change the result of the wait condition. > + * > + * This is supposed to be called while holding the lock. The lock is > + * dropped before going to sleep using spin_unlock() and is reacquired > + * using spin_lock() afterwards, but without globally disabling IRQs. > + * This is in contrast to wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout(), > + * which uses the spin_lock_irq() and spin_unlock_irq() functions instead. > + * > + * The function returns 0 if the @timeout elapsed, -ERESTARTSYS if it > + * was interrupted by a signal, and the remaining jiffies otherwise > + * if the condition evaluated to true before the timeout elapsed. > + */ > +#define wait_event_interruptible_lock_timeout(wq_head, condition, lock, \ > + timeout) \ > +({ \ > + long __ret = timeout; \ > + if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition)) \ > + __ret = __wait_event_lock_timeout( \ > + wq_head, condition, lock, timeout, \ > + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); \ > + __ret; \ > +}) > + > +/** > + * wait_event_lock_timeout - sleep until a condition gets true or a timeout > + * elapses. The condition is checked under the lock with IRQs > + * enabled. This is expected to be called with the lock taken. > + * @wq_head: the waitqueue to wait on > + * @condition: a C expression for the event to wait for > + * @lock: a spinlock_t that has been locked with spin_lock(), which will be > + * released before schedule() and reacquired afterwards. > + * @timeout: timeout, in jiffies > + * > + * The process is put to sleep (TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) until the > + * @condition evaluates to true or signal is received. The @condition is > + * checked each time the waitqueue @wq_head is woken up. > + * > + * wake_up() has to be called after changing any variable that could > + * change the result of the wait condition. > + * > + * This is supposed to be called while holding the lock. The lock is > + * dropped before going to sleep using spin_unlock() and is reacquired > + * using spin_lock() afterwards, but without globally disabling IRQs. > + * This is in contrast to wait_event_lock_irq_timeout(), which uses the > + * spin_lock_irq() and spin_unlock_irq() functions instead. Compared to > + * wait_event_interruptible_lock_timeout(), it uses the %TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE > + * instead of allowing the task to be interrupted. > + * > + * The function returns 0 if the @timeout elapsed, or the remaining jiffies > + * otherwise if the condition evaluated to true before the timeout elapsed. > + */ > +#define wait_event_lock_timeout(wq_head, condition, lock, timeout) \ > +({ \ > + long __ret = timeout; \ > + if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition)) \ > + __ret = __wait_event_lock_timeout( \ > + wq_head, condition, lock, timeout, \ > + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); \ > + __ret; \ > +}) > + > /* > * Waitqueues which are removed from the waitqueue_head at wakeup time > */ > > -- > 2.55.0 > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯