From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jiazi Li <jiazi.li@transsion.com>, Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/9] arm64/kprobes: Drop the XOL single-step fault PC check
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:12:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amzJZoxnpScpKWSR@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <747c80a43d3345cae59ec1456dfff45d237981dc.1785153469.git.hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 12:25:46PM +0000, Hongyan Xia wrote:
> From: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
>
> With the armed single-step window closed (the whole path noinstr, and
> every piece of instrumentable code confined to instrumentation windows
> that run in KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE/HIT_SSDONE state), no code other than the
> XOL instruction itself can execute while the state is KPROBE_HIT_SS or
> KPROBE_REENTER. A page fault taken in those states therefore necessarily
> originates from the XOL instruction, and the faulting-PC comparison is
> redundant; revert to handling all such faults as single-step faults (as
> before commit 879a6754d3d1).
>
> The simulated-kprobe early bail is kept: simulated probes have no XOL
> slot and execute (inside an instrumentation window) in debug trap
> context, so a fault there can still come from the simulation handlers
> and must not be treated as a single-step fault.
As commented on an earlier patch, to fix this properly I think we have
to make the simulation noinstr-safe.
Mark.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 12 ------------
> 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index 1658b6acd803..73bbbcdbbfe5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -309,18 +309,6 @@ int noinstr kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr)
> switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
> case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
> case KPROBE_REENTER:
> - /*
> - * A page fault taken while in KPROBE_HIT_SS or
> - * KPROBE_REENTER state is only attributable to kprobe
> - * single-stepping if the faulting PC points to the
> - * current kprobe's XOL instruction. If the fault occurred
> - * elsewhere (e.g. in perf or tracing code invoked from the
> - * debug exception path), leave it for the normal page fault
> - * handler to process.
> - */
> - if (instruction_pointer(regs) != (unsigned long)cur->ainsn.xol_insn)
> - break;
> -
> /*
> * We are here because the instruction being single
> * stepped caused a page fault. We reset the current
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 12:23 [RFC PATCH 0/9] arm64: Make the kprobes debug exception path noinstr Hongyan Xia
2026-07-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] arm64/entry: Bound certain debug exception paths in instrumentation windows Hongyan Xia
2026-07-31 14:41 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 3:42 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-07-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] arm64/entry: Make debug_exception_enter/exit() noinstr Hongyan Xia
2026-07-31 14:43 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] arm64/debug-monitors: Make do_el1_brk64()/do_el1_softstep() noinstr Hongyan Xia
2026-07-31 15:25 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 3:54 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-07-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] arm64/kprobes: Make the single-step machinery noinstr Hongyan Xia
2026-07-31 15:38 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 4:31 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-08-04 9:27 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-07-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] arm64/kprobes: Invoke pre/post handlers inside instrumentation Hongyan Xia
2026-07-31 15:44 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 6:11 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-07-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] arm64/kprobes: Make kprobe_fault_handler() noinstr Hongyan Xia
2026-07-31 15:57 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 6:40 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-07-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] arm64/kprobes: Drop the KPROBE_HIT_SS reentry special case Hongyan Xia
2026-07-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] arm64/kprobes: Drop the XOL single-step fault PC check Hongyan Xia
2026-07-31 16:12 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2026-07-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] arm64/debug: Mark debug exception helpers __always_inline Hongyan Xia
2026-07-27 19:22 ` Nick Desaulniers
2026-07-27 21:49 ` Will Deacon
2026-07-28 2:03 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-07-29 18:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-30 0:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-07-30 11:50 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-07-31 16:15 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amzJZoxnpScpKWSR@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hongyan.xia@transsion.com \
--cc=hupu@transsion.com \
--cc=jiazi.li@transsion.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®