Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dmaengine: dw-edma: Enable Chan Separation via VSEC

[Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>]

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 05:26:51PM +0530, Verma, Devendra wrote:
> On 10-Aug-26 22:44, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 03:40:01PM +0530, Devendra K Verma wrote:
> > > As per, 'Designware Cores PCI Express DM Controller - Reference
> > > Manual', section 3.2.34.3, VSEC for DEVICE INFORMATION supports
> > > the channel separation mechanisms. Basically, the HDMA IP allows
> > > the user to configure the separation between DMA channel
> > > registers and retrieve it via the VSEC capability mentioned
> > > above.
> > >
> > > HDMA IP supports the channel register space separation from
> > > 256B to 32KB. Default supported size is 256B.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Devendra K Verma <devverma@amd.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >     o Replaced 'ch_sep_sz' with 'ch_space_sz' wherever
> > >       applicable upon reviewer recommendation.
> > >     o Dropped 1/3 patch of this series, after review,
> > >       now the 2/3 is 1/2 of the current patch series.
> > >
> > > Changes in v1:
> > >     o Modified dw_edma_get_ch_sep_sz() as per review comment.
> > >       The function now supports ch_sep_sz up to 32KB.
> > >     o Updated to description to reflect the supported channel
> > >       separation sizes.
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> > >   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> > > index 791c46e8ae4c..5d7507a64056 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
> > > @@ -31,8 +31,10 @@
> > >
> > >   #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_ID		0x6
> > >   #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_ID		0x20
> > > -#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_BAR		GENMASK(10, 8)
> > >   #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_MAP		GENMASK(2, 0)
> > > +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_BAR		GENMASK(10, 8)
> >
> > Don't mix code cleanup or reorg into this improvement patches.
> >
>
> It was recommended by you in the v1 of the same patch series that is
> why pushed it.
>
> Ref: https://lore.kernel.org/all/amDbGHRbObX-lt5F@SMW015318/

You can fix the order by using prep patch, which just fix order, typo
or some cleanup.

But not mixed into new feature patches.

>
> > > +/* AMD CPM6 (Xilinx) supported cap */
> > > +#define DW_PCIE_XILINX_CPM6_VSEC_CH_SEP		GENMASK(18, 16)
> > >   #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH	GENMASK(9, 0)
> > >   #define DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH	GENMASK(25, 16)
> > >
> > > @@ -73,6 +75,7 @@ struct dw_edma_pcie_data {
> > >   	u16				wr_ch_cnt;
> > >   	u16				rd_ch_cnt;
> > >   	u64				devmem_phys_off;
> > > +	u32				ch_space_sz;
> > >   };
> > >
> > >   static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data snps_edda_data = {
> > > @@ -127,7 +130,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_mdb_data = {
> > >   };
> > >
> > >   static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_cpm6_dma_data = {
> > > -	/* MDB registers location */
> > > +	/* CPM6 registers location */
> >
> > This typo fix have not mixed this patch.
>
> This is subtle change. Since the focus of this patch series is CPM6, the
> namings and comments should align with the appropriate name.
>
> >
> > >   	.rg.bar				= BAR_0,
> > >   	.rg.off				= SZ_4K,	/*  4 Kbytes */
> > >   	.rg.sz				= SZ_8K,	/*  8 Kbytes */
> > > @@ -189,6 +192,13 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_irq_vector(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr)
> > >   	return pci_irq_vector(to_pci_dev(dev), nr);
> > >   }
> > >
> > > +static u32 dw_edma_get_ch_space_sz(u32 val)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (val > 0 && val <= 7)
> > > +		return 256 << val;
> > > +	return 256;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >   static u64 dw_edma_pcie_address(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t cpu_addr)
> > >   {
> > >   	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > > @@ -279,6 +289,10 @@ static void dw_edma_pcie_get_xilinx_dma_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > >   	pdata->mf = map;
> > >   	pdata->rg.bar = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_BAR, val);
> > >
> > > +	if (pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_XILINX_B00F)
> > > +		pdata->ch_space_sz = dw_edma_get_ch_space_sz
> > > +					(FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_CPM6_VSEC_CH_SEP, val));
> > > +
> > >   	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0xc, &val);
> > >   	pdata->wr_ch_cnt = min(pdata->wr_ch_cnt,
> > >   			       FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_XILINX_MDB_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH, val));
> > > @@ -324,9 +338,9 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > >   	struct dw_edma_pcie_data *pdata = (void *)pid->driver_data;
> > >   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > >   	struct dw_edma_chip *chip;
> > > +	bool non_ll = false;
> > >   	int err, nr_irqs;
> > >   	int i, mask;
> > > -	bool non_ll = false;
> >
> > unnecssary change here
> >
>
> Yeah, this change was part of some patch series I pushed.
> This change was breaking the inverted X-mas format that's why
> made this change.

But not related this patch. Use a small sperate patch to fix these small
problem.

Use a small patch to do clean up, for example

reorder register bit defination
fix commends about CPM6
fix inverted X-mas format.


Frank

>
> -Devendra
>
> > Frank
> > >
> > >   	if (!pdata)
> > >   		return -ENODEV;
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
>