From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBA8A30D40D; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 06:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786688143; cv=none; b=lBpieysPNBIs4Ycgn8zez7VGAcV0auhQaZjc7Nafg84ZyVXtizxkCurZ8OJoZ83AjJS3B6i28EJjHA+OVW3YFBAjK9Is8BnyPLwI1b9IUXjHHzsYXxyxnC42BaenSvQidMrmbRCMQs6Xaj+18y+k9SC6s3nSpJmGRIYZVEEvT08= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786688143; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NET8+GcD+ix8xYuauM6huY3QwaNswuAdMl96kZOFfeU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CP/x8Pm31mEP4v/sBAj3cWqk3dNs14kBCxa9bR9P9zzG/QGvgtTvEnTdBPYsDMJGBHDylowSwoHaIBcCp2WLYFSElrDU//qPoX0/2H8xR3YGUatE3rft7MXrnfAf0axwR64i/5Mn+PyA996nY7krU8w3kM19ZKcH2a21P+OvywM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=X5KVN3n+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X5KVN3n+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3ECE1F000E9; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 06:15:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786688142; bh=8ujbR8nfCaBIZLUlofmUmp3ccj2HHRqzUvdZpXAWPB4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=X5KVN3n+DutPTTTwYrJHBEZWeOVQrVXY/yRS4KkQEt3yopWn6lwEZDzGLDSlPBoGK 6P0R7J+UCvq+Cez+mCN7EW0qaLCcvkZM0AbhqEJH2bisDQYLlUmiRXAZwc84taQUM3 lqb06Jmj6B7iYYcv0xZ/pPG0XbYMYwKOK8NrX0bHk0txrLG9vg/co8lS87xFwZmHmZ qzFCXbW+3l1YPYLaobkEPgp9+pATpGVwd8oANeKKcY16Avt5jl5pxr+EF4Tr5/4UgF dcReljcLtmEctSW9mqDfzd8Lqe6r34KOcxAgUTnfYWQDgJwekF6rJiMJo32nymYh+o IdVmo94DzjCBw== Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:15:38 +0900 From: Namhyung Kim To: Jiebin Sun Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com, james.clark@linaro.org, jolsa@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, thomas.falcon@intel.com, tianyou.li@intel.com, wangyang.guo@intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] perf c2c: add function view hierarchy entry creation Message-ID: References: <20260810052647.588867-1-jiebin.sun@intel.com> <20260810052647.588867-7-jiebin.sun@intel.com> <20260814032306.2055624-3-jiebin.sun@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260814032306.2055624-3-jiebin.sun@intel.com> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:23:06AM +0800, Jiebin Sun wrote: > Hi Namhyung, > > > What if both DSOs are NULL? > > If both are NULL, the outer condition is true, but > left_dso != right_dso is false. The function therefore skips the DSO name > comparison and reaches the final _sort__sym_cmp() call, using the symbols > to distinguish the entries instead. Ah, ok. I misread the code that it may return undefined result or crash. Thanks, Namhyung