From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com (mail-ed1-f49.google.com [209.85.208.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB5AA431E4F for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 08:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786694621; cv=none; b=f0vlbX1pwusn+VaTKH2UBt6l15vemw952argjuATQ7HXwLspRej0Jw3gOotTLNO7yQHo0UQReyjU0NkwOeT1wxtEgh5sbvKfkMUnRV2i0A1BwphnrArGy2/vqYeKHREYbtC0XesLypqeUFdUxDnTOn6czdsB3pMLgzpZ0om+IkU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786694621; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HZPcZn6KVzUbjUq4/fHah+/C47ftJLRPnev0e4deQd4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fht55VSrAxXYUuo7FshK+oHul27eCLRAJlx7Ex5mfvlimTgsL9lgcJCufSSU0baS7AXZR8FD3CpmOOGbY/VGfYXAUNb+CY6eYkuyjix2s5SUlrYK8ScM3akduQD59hNTy5Zf88dzKxmKbLZucYtdl6j2FdRBYZoMNkK+TZLVLyg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=JaZK+RSv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="JaZK+RSv" Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-6a051b737d8so723498a12.1 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 01:03:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1786694617; x=1787299417; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=Qfga6kTEgNRkec+hK5oUCTaxG2BZlPVkrA02S50FL+E=; b=JaZK+RSvHZMRSUyHdCrn9l7vODLtg3hDkDGWzBHRDWinhyfaZvUVcZES5fClVYKY/5 Qosrj8AypMedXyKb2suNwdJQ5+RG/pfnIE2gwnKRjeeh20gDr/CvkUWzAVBvAHFU1LAt GKSek359Mf8lcHfedL1cvzblK8d7dwi+2VT4VGbDvSFcWfDqVKbbuYwoi9aJYuHwS9eL Pl0+wXGBAIwCzlgAkrPfw6hWZiI0ZqifLBc9LGeHPjPBn2W3g971vzgJuUg91i43F2Iv fM1vfZQ5MN1MgmdtsxyYooAjzXHjO04j5S3EGUV14cJdPRkUB1oDZtBDKU86FmyD/0v8 C6Sg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1786694617; x=1787299417; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=Qfga6kTEgNRkec+hK5oUCTaxG2BZlPVkrA02S50FL+E=; b=LIuurJuRjBUvV8tr0dYbm/KStnX/2t6iKl4rDWOexlNW8oCYXT6KoBZJ5Fp4okaqoU U6eXaQ4xCjRaIanTt4ye00wCZgKvSn++ua+5lEQYHiKBlKxq54N8XrJ1QItdzYS2NCCc LUJhvqXsbqVpCviHwfTAeAxh5W5Pm5l1/aJM6YQQGguFIbULQc54Q+kGWW8/hlLdzzEs mNMDZdp8rp/wI7qfIAcdsL7OWNY3tvwa8o7oe/Kh0kCEt7HPOxJTGWMIPIC8ijJY+Qc9 u/eY9fP42M2tN/RQO0hR5Xw6b+tkMLR0pvOq4xIbz/efwUeEWfwO/3HKLTPQVcaZIyit NdGA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RqU1atLIbIR21vhyVzFvoi5lNCi62U7f2x9xuCTBp7As1oh+UnOm8OCFO0Q6V7DixG4bZlo4e/KbLUvwXc=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSFPonC1B4DAYglunvmGdnvW06e78iltPv0anaYC/umMMVZ2Ev kEGlZpm+gPJ9ffzs8VV+AwYUpFWVj7IL6OVZlNWksqwuWoczud3JaYwa5UvFnl8Whg== X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD13IfL8Y2YMM71K0Y3PWaAjAUyPw2cmh0qFXd8IvXBt2r6KYpgm/lWG8q8kTz9y gm++MvVS8IT4+GOqRdPYHcOyUIuADcEwol89m6Hu9BeUSvOO5b6Um/Is2U9Fa3gInlVao4/70uB GKbveuXqaZMaeBWRcODGTMXxbkt3LOFXb/dt2gaDLo504Irv+hMsiYsnrr4D80z9wORPDORemUa I6vLFOHvimwEs4AIpNQGVqFt+z4kHm2z3IEEX2YXcsR0lo5Rj7E0qhRseX0jP/3iUeVSHq73Qac QFEw6+G+jJ6pEUqG/YmUec6q4WsfTcFOJysciIqQqSjodqKXAtCwE7MOySAxFoHPqEhnmScr17x OjgYFyBDPt04gLjtZzeOFMkkFKZCV3XPvOmuTqO77OOrP7nvp2PZd73ORErjVvQ0LJbknqbx4sf hkUVr/aV12LEOngyc8EBuMX8WjLqp9g4TVU5SPwk5GPSAyIwqGqpXcRM07j2n81XNKgIH7mAXPR 9jcdXigd8jb650LPxP0PKzP+EyUzgrJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:d08:b0:c12:9b98:209e with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c212a2d8028mr127457966b.23.1786694579960; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 01:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (135.91.155.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.155.91.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4815f2b1d9bsm6154877f8f.24.2026.08.14.01.02.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 14 Aug 2026 01:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:02:55 +0100 From: Vincent Donnefort To: Steven Rostedt Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] tracing: Fix subbuf resize races with trace_pipe_raw readers Message-ID: References: <20260813131152.3589632-1-vdonnefort@google.com> <20260813131152.3589632-7-vdonnefort@google.com> <20260813213153.4ac1e1ff@gandalf.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260813213153.4ac1e1ff@gandalf.local.home> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 09:31:53PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:11:48 +0100 > Vincent Donnefort wrote: > > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c > > index a00ab8a9cbd0..83292d90599e 100644 > > --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c > > +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c > > @@ -6976,34 +6976,52 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_swap_cpu); > > * ring_buffer_alloc_read_page - allocate a page to read from buffer > > * @buffer: the buffer to allocate for. > > * @cpu: the cpu buffer to allocate. > > + * @prev: The previous page to be repurposed (can be NULL). > > * > > - * This function is used in conjunction with ring_buffer_read_page. > > + * This function is used in conjunction with ring_buffer_read_page(). > > * When reading a full page from the ring buffer, these functions > > * can be used to speed up the process. The calling function should > > * allocate a few pages first with this function. Then when it > > * needs to get pages from the ring buffer, it passes the result > > - * of this function into ring_buffer_read_page, which will swap > > + * of this function into ring_buffer_read_page(), which will swap > > * the page that was allocated, with the read page of the buffer. > > * > > + * If @prev is provided, and it has a different order than the current > > + * subbuffer order, its payload will be freed and re-allocated. If it > > + * already matches the order, it is simply returned. > > + * > > * Returns: > > * The page allocated, or ERR_PTR > > */ > > -struct buffer_data_read_page * > > -ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu) > > +struct buffer_data_read_page *ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, > > + struct buffer_data_read_page *prev) > > I think we should do this differently. I don't like the "prev" argument. > Instead, let's pass by address. > > int ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, struct buffer_data_read_page **rpage) > > ack. > > > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c > > index 395238b2b715..f9399f391ac6 100644 > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c > > @@ -7080,8 +7080,8 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, > > { > > struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = filp->private_data; > > struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter; > > - void *trace_data; > > - int page_size; > > + void *trace_data, *prev_spare; > > + unsigned int spare_size; > > ssize_t ret = 0; > > ssize_t size; > > > > @@ -7091,36 +7091,30 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, > > if (iter->snapshot && tracer_uses_snapshot(iter->tr->current_trace)) > > return -EBUSY; > > > > - page_size = ring_buffer_subbuf_size_get(iter->array_buffer->buffer); > > +again: > > > > + prev_spare = info->spare; > > + if (prev_spare) { > > + spare_size = ring_buffer_read_page_size(info->spare); > > > > - /* Make sure the spare matches the current sub buffer size */ > > - if (info->spare) { > > - if (page_size != info->spare_size) { > > - ring_buffer_free_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, > > - info->spare_cpu, info->spare); > > - info->spare = NULL; > > - } > > + /* Do we have previous read data to read? */ > > + if (info->read < spare_size) > > + goto read; > > } > > > > - if (!info->spare) { > > - info->spare = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, > > - iter->cpu_file); > > - if (IS_ERR(info->spare)) { > > - ret = PTR_ERR(info->spare); > > - info->spare = NULL; > > - } else { > > - info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file; > > - info->spare_size = page_size; > > - } > > - } > > - if (!info->spare) > > + /* Make sure the read page order is aligned with the current buffer subbuf order */ > > + info->spare = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file, > > + prev_spare); > > + if (IS_ERR(info->spare)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(info->spare); > > + info->spare = NULL; > > + ring_buffer_free_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, info->spare_cpu, prev_spare); > > return ret; > > + } > > > instead of the above: > > ret = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file, > &info->space); > > Where the above could do (under lock): > > if (*rpage) { > if (*rpage)->order == buffer->subbuf_order) > return 0; > ring_buffer_free_read_page(*rpage); > *rpage = NULL; > } > > *rpage = all the reader page; > > That is, lets completely remove the responsibility of the user having to > keep track of the buffer order here. > > > > > - /* Do we have previous read data to read? */ > > - if (info->read < page_size) > > - goto read; > > + spare_size = ring_buffer_read_page_size(info->spare); > > + info->read = spare_size; > > + info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file; > > > > - again: > > trace_access_lock(iter->cpu_file); > > ret = ring_buffer_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, > > info->spare, > > And if we could make ring_buffer_read_page() return -EAGAIN if the spare is > not the proper order. And only for that case. Sounds good. -- Vincent > > > > @@ -7129,6 +7123,10 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, > > trace_access_unlock(iter->cpu_file); > > > > if (ret < 0) { > > + /* Did we race with ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set ? */ > > + if (spare_size != ring_buffer_subbuf_size_get(iter->array_buffer->buffer)) > > + goto again; > > Then here we can just have: > > if (ret == -EAGAIN) > goto again; > > -- Steve > > > > + > > if (trace_empty(iter) && !iter->closed) { > > if (update_last_data_if_empty(iter->tr)) > > return 0; > > @@ -7142,12 +7140,14 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, > > > > goto again; > > } > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > info->read = 0; > > + > > read: > > - size = page_size - info->read; > > + size = spare_size - info->read; > > if (size > count) > > size = count; > > trace_data = ring_buffer_read_page_data(info->spare);