From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
To: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
Cc: mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
tao.ma@oracle.com, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com,
r33s3n6@gmail.com, zzzccc427@gmail.com, tom442288@tuta.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: validate global bitmap cl_bpc before resize
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:37:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anA2DiyxdwUeJn0V@p15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803031116.3994362-1-gality369@gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 11:11:16AM +0800, ZhengYuan Huang wrote:
> [BUG]
> A corrupted global bitmap inode can make online group extension scan past
> the end of a group descriptor bitmap:
>
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _find_next_bit+0xef/0x120 lib/find_bit.c:157
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff888021b52000 by task syz.0.34/409
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ...
> _find_next_bit+0xef/0x120 lib/find_bit.c:157
> find_next_bit include/linux/find.h:73 [inline]
> find_next_bit_le include/linux/find.h:518 [inline]
> ocfs2_find_max_contig_free_bits+0x53/0xb0 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1292
> ocfs2_update_last_group_and_inode fs/ocfs2/resize.c:127 [inline]
> ocfs2_group_extend+0x83e/0x1ae0 fs/ocfs2/resize.c:350
> ocfs2_ioctl+0x175/0x6e0 fs/ocfs2/ioctl.c:869
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:583 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x1e0 fs/ioctl.c:583
> ...
>
> [CAUSE]
> ocfs2_group_extend() trusts the global bitmap dinode's cl_bpc value.
> If its high byte corrupted from zero to 0xc9 makes cl_bpc 51457.
> Extending by seven clusters narrows their product to a u16 value of
> 32519 and raises a 2048-bit group to 34567 bits, beyond its 32256-bit
> bitmap. The subsequent maximum-free-run scan then reads into the next
> page.
>
> [FIX]
> Reject a global bitmap whose cl_bpc is not one before using it in any
> resize arithmetic. The global allocator has exactly one bitmap bit per
> cluster, so this validates the invariant at the cold online-resize
> boundary and reports metadata corruption instead of enlarging bg_bits
> past the descriptor.
>
> Fixes: d659072f7368 ("[PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: Add group extend for online resize")
> Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/resize.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
> index 6375d5035972..556aaa319621 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
> @@ -311,6 +311,14 @@ int ocfs2_group_extend(struct inode * inode, int new_clusters)
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> + cl_bpc = le16_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_bpc);
> + if (cl_bpc != 1) {
cl_bpc is not a fixed value. Refer from mkfs.ocfs2(8), only both block size
and cluster size are 4K, cl_bpc is 1. Otherwise, cl_bpc is 2, 4, ....
Btw, is it any possible to put the check in ocfs2_validate_inode_block()?
Thanks,
Heming
> + ret = ocfs2_error(main_bm_inode->i_sb,
> + "Invalid global bitmap bits per cluster %u\n",
> + cl_bpc);
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> if (le16_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_cpg) !=
> ocfs2_group_bitmap_size(osb->sb, 0,
> osb->s_feature_incompat) * 8) {
> @@ -332,7 +340,6 @@ int ocfs2_group_extend(struct inode * inode, int new_clusters)
> }
> group = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *)group_bh->b_data;
>
> - cl_bpc = le16_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_bpc);
> if (le16_to_cpu(group->bg_bits) / cl_bpc + new_clusters >
> le16_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_cpg)) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 3:11 ZhengYuan Huang
2026-08-03 6:37 ` Heming Zhao [this message]
2026-08-04 6:48 ` ZhengYuan Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anA2DiyxdwUeJn0V@p15 \
--to=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=gality369@gmail.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=r33s3n6@gmail.com \
--cc=tao.ma@oracle.com \
--cc=tom442288@tuta.io \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®