From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB763909B9 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 16:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785775818; cv=none; b=bS67BjYAHsBfBidKJVy01xmrb5m4GibACcd+dmHisCC7TVNxMEhHqOskRNACPEjencw5ZJNrbWBnmwonJ5qN4xPjcK5U/GKAV9FGxvKfrQyEWg6wdi+pzdBGXDTC59l6Nhcfm+bv9I6NddsRtCverXrLQyXptOzoLnUIzpnHyp8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785775818; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v+2FOitbOAkYnY2hA6hmlH/DLmfQnO42XAhYzqTUxlg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cpiE7DaDA9wVgILMdO3LtLyghUlHrCbzwAi7QwwCfV4D7eqf+HduBRXSaLz83U0SqGucnCdzRiq2WXd2auzV+2kFoFteVGsfm18Pj8tLfv3hea4newfgurswotqTYbzPJDeBr5qHDinQZDsSELVeLORuFmN7dOLM4LqrV9IioaM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MDNCGIqL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MDNCGIqL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAEC61F000E9; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 16:50:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785775816; bh=0P39Ktlh+ormR40sazoJbc0EZYrzYUprYqPO5jXcoX0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=MDNCGIqLH9flwH7xvIWRj1/bZ/MVuNpLXqa9+R0OxInUBqRYNtGkRtV+6dTTrrVs+ pyIkCAjh2qoPjk6rcSL98zQs1ED4CAOa7+mstvVCGSVF+5NXqTC3FYFOoLeR981SR7 GYcUpc6ACCjOR06SWL/VBfXssYk2sMY79JUnib7Rg996XUgCIw+3nb86VlBJLBJIKH r8VALT+mx7npzoD9fVySIg+vnJoyIQLSApJAxL7GX9q0lMwWKmN83opAXjtJcAJ1Qx rXDSvwrlThq/ADr6O7Wqv8hJ+JASg4nRBWLAadZiMMfvRdQzOQZv0pRlNpPFxDhEPJ PWUkHERvz/OLQ== Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 06:50:16 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Breno Leitao Cc: Lai Jiangshan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, marco.crivellari@suse.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: release pwq pools by pool type Message-ID: References: <20260731-wq-pool-refactor-v1-0-8eaf71cdab5f@debian.org> <20260731-wq-pool-refactor-v1-3-8eaf71cdab5f@debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hello, On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 07:02:46AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > +/* True if @pool is tied to a specific CPU, rather than an unbound > > > pool. */ +static bool is_pool_cpu_specific(struct worker_pool *pool) > > > > I'm not sure about introducing a new term. Can we just stick to > > percpu? > > Sure -- is_percpu_pool() any better? Yeah, that sounds fine to me. Thanks. -- tejun