From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986353F825A; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 12:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786018809; cv=none; b=jA9E53zXPPDq4S9WrdiZF3P3nDh6b9wbwYIQo+W+FaUhUvrXgaIcikwzbssuQHmqUsPc+OiAjA4y+sGugprqM/iA9NT+w+7wuxMartJYWgXlUmsWP9HEFr3O8NrW4VDiJeJRvSMsUF1nXi10JolkT5rKusY3XY1KYn0Y7thBwAM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786018809; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/6NSNy4+LnPKF4OkSSDMH0CGyaDS0qRTalBg5O8t+IM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rg7o1hpyIV2GhQrMnarb1W929ZmnK/eKZWvBOGwGquZbNS+p/OPat87/gY5j0K1S12Kd97CTBexbNa8UxktPApK4aX1l9YIJ6nrKYARJQLk9O+29fP+JTEimb5uqr8m6zcLk+6XXUyyojBKBrUrqlICsgqkqgInx5cDmCSpIFLk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gfG3LPxe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gfG3LPxe" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 427061F000E9; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 12:20:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786018808; bh=7C1FpHXQHhaXmJHx/8OCdTfxUT9wAJECfFf7MxmJFok=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=gfG3LPxeUPq84Xp2JFwWxR+xz6vWQPO9xA8azlKyQaXXtCueQNjKnnBacy/zVDZrL l5traZsL4ERhfpYjx7Qb7DuwGzVBKWZvoS7u8rKbX2a9NmHWqCqZJLLwBA2c3FUt5O HecAcRZGO7uHXHhjlvEaPT1Nz8oO/w5C64IJz8GIMrxBsuKTPJvdGgSLo4XkOBu1j9 +b0ZdUKkwzYUEAtvniztZGUdWmdFB0JPVpRu0kf9VZTSuJKDO/sSu19jQp6xnMyqol WSRDf5gED372yERjG3MA5QbKh9w1yUmGhZutyJvevaA/0kz2W2XDYhZ6wMxrdTI6t5 vbsW7qxqelqYA== Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 13:20:02 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Karl Mehltretter , kernel-team@android.com, Mark Rutland , Oleg Nesterov , Shuah Khan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Fix inactive SVE and SSVE regsets Message-ID: References: <20260729004255.15630-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> <178566413306.4141663.7146790540592743319.b4-ty@kernel.org> <21702e5c-2dcc-46ad-bffe-26cd76d844b9@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:15:25PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 10:27:18PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > As noted in the changelog applying patch 1 as a fix and this only for > > > -next blows up the fp-ptrace test rather impressively in any > > > configuration which can generate headers only reports: > > > > https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/3075737#L3231 > > > > for the release. Both patches really do need to go together. > > > By "blows up" you mean the test fails, right? That's the same behaviour > > if anybody runs the test on a kernel without the fix. Both patches are > > merged in for-next/core. > > Right, the test starts reporting 96 fails which doesn't look great in a > dashboard. I'd misread the original branch as being merged as a fix but > I see it's not been merged into the fixes branch, sorry for the > confusion. No problem, thank you for running the tests :) Will