From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506ED3AFD17 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786463032; cv=none; b=g/23oRyW3TlMpiOcRngNBZ2wK4RI4ijfEbM3m+OdIzYy9ome36npKBtZZwl84gZ0Rpye1/6pHXutECu7ZkGmAwPA0GE6pgiT3U1iK4KxJOtnGGoyNgyXHSmqYY0PKKRzqTrI/H1qQZQjm+dLv7NWSk7m4uIt+5YPGRSNzafhfjs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786463032; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hQLSjCwZk9nOSIrJE2YUoZMmluijQPyTacbicC/GIzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ocY+G7sL6XXUDj2dFW4BDCqKpuq6mx7B7ABSSTH5IGAJnokVe8urLd/644A0ulr+T02ynIePXLI5rTSUZ61+xrS9CYQOQDQq1JU3/RxaAtE82eg96VZYlCIlxbCBzfFnnNVdiBAn65qTRjRRj9oQEt4hvzFmP376h2ICSBN9EEI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=tACVSB9h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="tACVSB9h" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EAB1516; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 096D23F632; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:43:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1786463030; bh=hQLSjCwZk9nOSIrJE2YUoZMmluijQPyTacbicC/GIzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tACVSB9haxx+b5z5esFq1GdMDSp73EAaLWClW5d/yi9uQLUdt9xeDY4nnDhmtPnen uUTqogDxL2FL1EtY3wdTkQ1cAeYnH0b1Yt9vpRphjoNKPL06DiEnxTbG0GYEqGdscc K5F3mV4QK7ftIcrVGstaMk6l+ktUqPBcUQBvvnwM= Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 16:43:46 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Ard Biesheuvel , Eric Biggers , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Oliver Upton , Herbert Xu , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] arm64: Remove unused big-endian support Message-ID: References: <20260811140132.22778-1-will@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260811140132.22778-1-will@kernel.org> On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 03:01:19PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi folks, > > Big-endian support on arm64 (CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN) has depended on > BROKEN since 1cf89b6bf660 ("arm64: Kconfig: Make CPU_BIG_ENDIAN depend > on BROKEN") and has already seen some clean-up patches removing some of > the unused support code (e.g. 5276ea17a23c ("lib/crc: arm64: Assume a > little-endian kernel")). > > Finish the job, and remove the remaining big-endian support code from > arm64. Note that the SETEND emulation for 32-bit tasks remains and so > some of the mixed-endian EL0 helpers are retained. Acked-by: Catalin Marinas