mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Junzhong Pan <panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com"
	<troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>,
	"peixin.xie@linux.spacemit.com" <peixin.xie@linux.spacemit.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: resume xHCI child on runtime resume in host mode
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 02:11:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao-QDVibwU90yPm_@vbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811090817.109350-1-panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com>

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 11, 2026, Junzhong Pan wrote:
> USB controller runtime suspend halts the controller on disconnection.
> It relies on platforms with custom connection notification to start
> the controller again.
> 
> The host branch of dwc3_runtime_resume() does nothing currently. There
> are two paths that can trigger a runtime resume of the dwc3 core in
> host mode:
> 
> (a) Wake lands on the xHCI child (DT platforms, e.g. Qualcomm, i.MX8MP)
>     A platform wakeup IRQ fires and the glue handler calls
>     pm_runtime_resume(&xhci->dev). Runtime PM walks upward, resumes
>     the dwc3 parent first, then resumes xHCI. Both wake correctly.
> 
> (b) Wake lands on the dwc3 parent (ACPI platforms)
>     When an ACPI Notify(ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE) targets the dwc3
>     parent device -- for example via a Generic Event Device on a
>     hardware-reduced platform where dwc3 is enumerated as an ACPI
>     device without a glue driver -- the ACPI core turns this into
>     pm_request_resume(dwc3_dev). Runtime PM does not propagate resume
>     downward, so the xHCI child stays suspended. Root hub polling is
>     never re-armed, and a device plugged in while suspended is silently
>     dropped.

Good catch.

> 
> This patch fills in the host branch to cover case (b) by requesting an
> async resume of the xHCI child so xhci_resume() can restore the port
> state machine and re-arm root hub polling. Async is required to avoid
> deadlocking on the parent's own rpm_resume() re-entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Junzhong Pan <panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com>
> ---
> base-commit: d58772d8520c7ef247c4b95c9bd76d3a25da9ff5
>  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> index ceb49f2f8004..bce56765ad90 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> @@ -2668,6 +2668,18 @@ int dwc3_runtime_resume(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	case DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST:
> +		/*
> +		 * Only the xHCI child's resume re-arms root hub polling, which
> +		 * is what rediscovers a device plugged in while suspended.
> +		 * Runtime PM never resumes children on its own, so request it
> +		 * here. This has to be asynchronous: resuming the child
> +		 * synchronously would deadlock because rpm_resume() tries to
> +		 * resume the parent before the child, and here the parent's
> +		 * own callback has not returned yet.
> +		 */

This note sounds as if this is needed to all cases, but you're only
describing only case b) here. Can you also mention for case a) that
there maybe an extra resume work call.

Would be nice for it to be cleaner without the extra call, but I think
it should be fine.

> +		if (dwc->xhci)
> +			pm_request_resume(&dwc->xhci->dev);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		/* do nothing */
>  		break;
> --
> 2.25.1
> 

Thanks for the patch, can you resubmit with the proper assisted-by tag
and remove the RFC?

After the change:

Acked-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>

Thanks,
Thinh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27  2:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11  9:08 Junzhong Pan
2026-08-12  0:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-12  1:51   ` Junzhong Pan
2026-08-27  2:11 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2026-08-27  9:52   ` Junzhong Pan
2026-08-27 23:42     ` Thinh Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ao-QDVibwU90yPm_@vbox \
    --to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com \
    --cc=peixin.xie@linux.spacemit.com \
    --cc=troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®