mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Yang Zi <2959243019@qq.com>
Cc: elder@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] greybus: operation: Fix NULL pointer dereference in gb_operation_message_alloc()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 16:12:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao2iuKpS3YPspthU@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_4F423FBD3FCE6066A8538BB3CFBCB0C41E09@qq.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 05:23:09PM +0800, Yang Zi wrote:
> gb_connection_recv() reads msg_size from the received message header but
> only rejects it when it is larger than the received buffer
> ("size < msg_size"); it does not reject msg_size smaller than the message
> header itself.  A malicious or corrupted header.size of 0 passes that
> check and is forwarded to gb_operation_create_incoming() with size 0.
> 
> There, request_size = size - sizeof(struct gb_operation_msg_hdr)
> underflows to SIZE_MAX - 7, and in gb_operation_message_alloc()
> message_size = payload_size + sizeof(*header) wraps back around to 0.
> The "message_size > hd->buffer_size_max" check is therefore bypassed,
> kzalloc(0) returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR, and gb_operation_message_init() writes
> header->size to that pointer.
> 
> KASAN report:
> 
>     BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in gb_operation_message_init drivers/greybus/operation.c:340 [inline] [greybus]
>     BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in gb_operation_message_alloc+0xab4/0xdb0 drivers/greybus/operation.c:385 [greybus]
>     Write of size 2 at addr 0000000000000010 by task syz.0.1/1100
> 
> Fix this by rejecting messages whose claimed size is smaller than the
> message header in gb_connection_recv(), and additionally make
> gb_operation_message_alloc() overflow-safe by comparing the payload size
> against hd->buffer_size_max - sizeof(*header) before adding the header
> size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zi <2959243019@qq.com>

How was this issue found and fixed? Did you use an LLM and are missing
an Assisted-by tag?

Based on a quick glance, this look correct, but your patch is corrupt
and cannot be applied. (This appears to be the case with all the 30+
patches you sent out today.)

Please fix your mail setup and send a v2 (try sending it to yourself
first and make sure you can apply it and run checkpatch on it). You
should look into using git-send-email.

Johan

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-25 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25  9:23 Yang Zi
2026-08-25 14:12 ` Johan Hovold [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ao2iuKpS3YPspthU@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=2959243019@qq.com \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®