From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>,
Jianhao Xu <jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] remoteproc: xlnx: initialize mailbox work before requesting channels
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:53:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao3IpdsQDjDXXawj@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818101201.1603947-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 06:12:01PM +0800, Runyu Xiao wrote:
> zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() installs zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb() as the mailbox RX
> callback before requesting the mailbox channels, but initializes
> ipi->mbox_work only after both channels have been requested. Once the RX
> channel is active, a notification delivered before the late INIT_WORK()
> would make the callback queue an uninitialized work item.
>
> Initialize the work item before requesting channels. Also drain the work
> before freeing the mailbox state, after the channels have been released so
> no new callbacks can queue it. Use the same drain before freeing ipi from
> the channel request error paths, since the callback is already published
> there as well.
>
> This issue was found by our static analysis tool and then confirmed by
> manual review of the mailbox setup sequence. The callback is published
> before the channel requests complete, so the work item should be ready
> before the mailbox provider can invoke it.
>
> A QEMU PoC modeled a mailbox notification delivered after the RX callback
> became reachable but before the delayed INIT_WORK(). DEBUG_OBJECTS reported
> queueing an uninitialized work item from the zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() path.
>
> This is sent as an RFC because the practical trigger depends on the ZynqMP
> IPI mailbox provider and firmware delivery timing. If the provider cannot
> invoke the RX callback until after setup returns, this is a defensive
> lifecycle cleanup rather than a reachable race on current systems.
>
> Fixes: 5dfb28c257b7 ("remoteproc: xilinx: Add mailbox channels for rpmsg")
> Signed-off-by: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Follow Mathieu's feedback and call cancel_work_sync() before freeing ipi
> from the tx/rx channel request error paths.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Follow Tanmay's suggestion and keep zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() taking the
> child device pointer. Do not move the r5_core assignment in this patch.
> - Only move INIT_WORK() before channel requests and drain the work in
> zynqmp_r5_free_mbox().
>
> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
I will pick this up when RC1 comes out next week.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> index c685bb5fa62c..d47fbf143acd 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -318,6 +318,8 @@ static struct mbox_info *zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct device *cdev)
> if (!ipi)
> return NULL;
>
> + INIT_WORK(&ipi->mbox_work, handle_event_notified);
> +
> mbox_cl = &ipi->mbox_cl;
> mbox_cl->rx_callback = zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb;
> mbox_cl->tx_block = false;
> @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ static struct mbox_info *zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct device *cdev)
> ipi->tx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(mbox_cl, "tx");
> if (IS_ERR(ipi->tx_chan)) {
> ipi->tx_chan = NULL;
> + cancel_work_sync(&ipi->mbox_work);
> kfree(ipi);
> dev_warn(cdev, "mbox tx channel request failed\n");
> return NULL;
> @@ -339,13 +342,12 @@ static struct mbox_info *zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct device *cdev)
> mbox_free_channel(ipi->tx_chan);
> ipi->rx_chan = NULL;
> ipi->tx_chan = NULL;
> + cancel_work_sync(&ipi->mbox_work);
> kfree(ipi);
> dev_warn(cdev, "mbox rx channel request failed\n");
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - INIT_WORK(&ipi->mbox_work, handle_event_notified);
> -
> return ipi;
> }
>
> @@ -364,6 +366,8 @@ static void zynqmp_r5_free_mbox(struct mbox_info *ipi)
> ipi->rx_chan = NULL;
> }
>
> + cancel_work_sync(&ipi->mbox_work);
> +
> kfree(ipi);
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 7:48 [RFC PATCH] " Runyu Xiao
2026-06-22 18:00 ` Shah, Tanmay
2026-07-17 2:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Runyu Xiao
2026-07-17 13:13 ` Shah, Tanmay
2026-07-22 15:36 ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-08-18 10:12 ` [RFC PATCH v3] " Runyu Xiao
2026-08-25 16:53 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ao3IpdsQDjDXXawj@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=tanmay.shah@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®