From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8F02066DE; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787724481; cv=none; b=bK7/BDv+MEDGU4rKu1PqzdUkGCro2RHHI4+zOUQnwf0xvOs+FL9E6ZZ0IkWIhLVQbUwSsVJORrkycq48byVgnQHav412A3GtolSq0vPT70p8yoTyUftstfEKAZK3A0/aYRXLkb8Eb3x7RfilNFvkNgTevzem8BUUMUlOAtLyTUI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787724481; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RD6QVBPnL95A2nbdXL1WmKm15P81+c+dUGy88c6tx90=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BOO+0vsEgtGnNfDQ9nauWzgxjmNhjrOYxz7fiDMvgAuD3mDfW+tBS1cRJBVsv9IST4RgSOLeJ9qquS9COnb6Tzij+rldB8XI9/d/vpwwUIKDHPfU+K2VDNB4qMzLuyXPKPyoNGBB5sG0hHBOqjxJh90F/QDcfviwzhx6Iq+V0Zw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C3rrI2Zo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C3rrI2Zo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A852A1F000E9; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:07:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787724480; bh=dFO/ykH2CGhqjy9gG6n+B+xyCQz/sDpwXbPuI04tWt0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=C3rrI2ZofAaYdWkBs7G0W1oare1gecw+He+jGZWXN1l8lqEkEtAoss2f4sxLsRToT 6X/SR+PhvxhGQrcHvY2f3TLRbtmk4+/x+jK8R3mAINbuaG0g1SUuSe4apwgJ/Zkyg6 tqzBXXf/pakbh+BW6zVDqm7fju9BToK8PoTSMPkQEQM7JIACkeHBfR1JKO19fKOYci gSnsgHV96RyPtVIwm+ngBmEuRiQA0YvFe92oJ4KogpmOGe0hXf4HRDJJq53yZ80jD2 Fe2Hgq+MAIL9akH1Kg68TGP8jYZrMV+F8HxFqrPIP3gem+egqoCBlQOlRt7DKvNVY/ OGq164veYgG6Q== Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:07:51 +0000 From: Tzung-Bi Shih To: Sean Rhodes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Corentin Chary , "Luke D. Jones" , Denis Benato , Hans de Goede , Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , Prasanth Ksr , Jorge Lopez , Mark Pearson , "Derek J. Clark" , Joshua Grisham , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Chen-Yu Tsai , Huacai Chen , Brian Norris , Julius Werner , Thomas Zimmermann , Javier Martinez Canillas , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Florian Fainelli , Danilo Krummrich , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig_=28The_Capable_Hub=29?= , Titouan Ameline de Cadeville , Takashi Sakamoto , Kees Cook , Bjorn Helgaas , chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bjorn Andersson , Dmitry Baryshkov , Geert Uytterhoeven , Arnd Bergmann , Eric Biggers , Luca Weiss , Michal Simek , Sven Peter Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 RESEND 3/5] firmware: Rename google firmware directory to coreboot Message-ID: References: <557d363a779c3c03bfe939dc2fefd6a4265fa7ad.1787584107.git.sean@starlabs.systems> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <557d363a779c3c03bfe939dc2fefd6a4265fa7ad.1787584107.git.sean@starlabs.systems> On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Sean Rhodes wrote: > Most drivers in drivers/firmware/google are coreboot table drivers rather > than Google-specific firmware drivers. Rename the directory to coreboot > and update the Kconfig prompt, build path and maintainer entry. ... > drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/Kconfig | 2 +- The patch has no build-time dependency on other patches in the series. I'm happy to apply it once v7.3-rc1 is out to move this forward. For the drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/Kconfig change, could the DRM maintainers please provide an Acked-by so this can go through the same tree? Otherwise, it needs to be separated before the patch can be applied.