From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C357333CE9A; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 07:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786863891; cv=none; b=QfeMeT+RBxgM7CiCUWR20omDc2mZYfLPTxSDb959WcSeB+OlN1kfx0X3v/njtc/Lgs31cVsL9qgd5scp1+p0q0VhHMJ23lt7P2YKs4f7Dm0i9JYEoSPFpxmBRAmZX46dNFlJrA2WmerDay/9CWsN6Cq6s6sNuji21Z3vuUjykwI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786863891; c=relaxed/simple; bh=umSxNNhx6O6I/O3YfUKvyhJJ7o0ZhYnB9LLBKcLTSTQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=k63CRBMo+HfLD/1sfHFXfaP0Uop9/0xuOmMISw61mLYkuh0bdVk++AHwUnApWINI0SR1f9s5CDaGijXKf+myYQxSBxQBf12o5jWKXp6vp8qfVi90WYHDUrXnvzWKTzwfkvelNzZJtRHgi3MMzoeDbDfWf+U2ihfKj68mAnEOwAI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=f2yUfIq0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="f2yUfIq0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 90E4A1F000E9; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 07:04:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786863890; bh=umSxNNhx6O6I/O3YfUKvyhJJ7o0ZhYnB9LLBKcLTSTQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=f2yUfIq0T7SdCQI/jpZgW58n7dEqEcMqFU74sovc7Rc72Oezw+uYCBE0gIr+Wittc VSBsp+4Q/sc+8LJyRsfTn5hYyPWH0OFhKOzdmtgIPG3CcNNOs1bGUJ6XCVP31F1Mlq 7DvWkQd7JaAg8PIqMShqlIlDMn1Pno9CTjoOwn9tk7h1NBM4csCBT2SXNSblCs4bkY WVSn0p8BjNo0ZG1rtkBfwdX6+YEO1R4uErPFW03drpRWIawH9R2iesn+nugHNE1I3J 2iw76WYsQmztaqSDI0zcqvMmxeqIa55OWKsasmjEjDkevDSGftPW0udxED2hQm/LLF LwgnErISKV7+Q== Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 09:04:47 +0200 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: Eliav Farber Cc: rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, guohanjun@huawei.com, mchehab@kernel.org, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, lenb@kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, linusw@kernel.org, brgl@kernel.org, orsonzhai@gmail.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com, jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, hansg@kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, W_Armin@gmx.de, fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com, kaihengf@nvidia.com, ankita@nvidia.com, leitao@debian.org, pedro.pbg@usp.br, paulmck@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, saket.dumbre@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] notifier: add device-managed registration APIs Message-ID: References: <20260816060648.4030-1-farbere@amazon.com> <20260816060648.4030-2-farbere@amazon.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="onpq2odccwuwli4t" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260816060648.4030-2-farbere@amazon.com> --onpq2odccwuwli4t Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] notifier: add device-managed registration APIs MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello, I already replied to Sashiko's review and only noticed afterwards that this way most recipients are stripped. So here again for the wide audience: I suggested to add "Must be called in process context." to the kdoc for devm_atomic_notifier_chain_register() as this is a relevant difference to atomic_notifier_chain_register() and create an immutable branch for it as a base for subsystems to apply their follow-up patches. I'd wait till Wednesday for concerns and review tags to tickle in. Best regards Uwe --onpq2odccwuwli4t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmqBYQwACgkQj4D7WH0S /k7skgf8C5Wzbv3n8obmaaNWbEaCkUDjzqae3xgk7u64wEFfxeRUOYTWzeQZVOnq oQjiSoq6sPHfjWRz1jt3M7nnxPptJpOO7wuHkNWi5wVzcVaR7XjyQJBi3EhQGFtW b0Ykm/EHwSuUL5F4ITNOmyjx4+8ViM6+PlWCXJEvjEgCYkC7MVJKvuJZPgW8zsWK MbbzQZKUTrtrFc4rTiUsNXiFqsz9TG5XBgSrBoC5fq/9kQa7wunYMwpDI5rOvKf/ S0NiJIIFkOu/s+ZQZCBDbqE1T6RGlb7lOgKI9GRg/d2pkXusFqa/Ie2vIUQD6BUz XgkLX+yXJp4OVU/+dENxKEs1CqBGbA== =59T7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --onpq2odccwuwli4t--