From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@animalcreek.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: omap-aes: fix autosuspend cleanup during teardown
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:34:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoQZIqPofaVmOk7M@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260808083612.2698779-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 08, 2026 at 04:36:12PM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> omap_aes_probe() calls pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(), but neither the
> probe failure path nor omap_aes_remove() calls the matching
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() before disabling runtime PM.
>
> If the autosuspend delay is set to a negative value while autosuspend
> is enabled, the runtime PM core increments usage_count to prevent
> runtime suspend. Without calling pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()
> during teardown, this reference is not dropped and usage_count remains
> unbalanced.
As I've explained elsewhere, this is just misleading. There is no usage
count leak here as the count is balanced whenever the user re-enables
autosuspend through sysfs (by writing a non-negative timeout).
Drivers should clean up after themselves and disable autosuspend, but
this is more of a clean up than a fix and should not be backported.
You've sent upwards of 60 of these in the matter of a just a few days,
some of which have even been picked up. Please send follow-ups (replies
or v2s) as soon as possible to prevent further of these from getting
merged.
> Add the missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() calls to both the
> probe failure and remove paths before disabling runtime PM.
>
> This issue was found by manual code inspection.
>
> Fixes: 5946c4a5e770 ("crypto: omap-aes - Convert to use pm_runtime API")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Johan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 8:36 Guangshuo Li
2026-08-18 8:34 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoQZIqPofaVmOk7M@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgreer@animalcreek.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®