From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BB483D0C07; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 07:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787123977; cv=none; b=iXHdDAtkYANY6FjNjJ79HifUf5tMOstC4fkx5VbJxuwhNq22tCL+X4zCCKjSfhfkpVH4roBb8/r376DHOnXosKHXMQ7s6n8HTZi3yaOXwH4n3Ru6m+RkgU61l3SzyXUVyBNRuUsN3QPWQpJ0tuTBEQ3ehfwZWjEevXuuWGpapPg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787123977; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0LHSfQrJ0hE8SAWt/bJ2lltily29zhoRIQldeqI12Bo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oliZIIti/RfxZRPCs+jZvyGmqsj5i/yJUjyFxCN2w++eq5xarQ4zN6GUz6vDAElYZ+EZB2vtVz3KPdzp5Nsblr9r8hZhxkUBO8ie4iu/nXfrS6cVumMbJ/dVlpR/QEFRzlR8QfShHfq8+loyw/+Gy+0Av3WBRWmlCUcNsRIl/EA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CPXA935w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CPXA935w" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1787123976; x=1818659976; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0LHSfQrJ0hE8SAWt/bJ2lltily29zhoRIQldeqI12Bo=; b=CPXA935w8mGbtIfn/TAE21Ljzdau4KfxuOiu6KyrkBO8studgnb0BEoe z+QUWodck1qG/KHP5qIkjUygVYritJqbBXQyu7nA+8HDBZp3m3X56qtzJ o1/+41NpePOo9Lp01DoWF+NLad+mysaLHTdsE0mc5hpsxs0f2olMUX9ZP Vj/v4adxy3KHf7Rgu9TlpIs9UeUdoPYa4B2CfqZTuYvf2LfINLqInc++Z yE4FZNjN+Bx42rvox+urG4mlf69JoMqkvIU78osw3DIopqoKs+d6hlljP 6LBUSidyhKZmZTC+1efQHnMdxlFwtc9b36iKUztPEhVWWNg3aRCPLXQzS A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: V9ulcl4tRBOH7zjdSscraw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: q15s23j7S/2N/+Q2H/xOEw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11879"; a="90147933" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,231,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="90147933" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2026 00:19:35 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: G9zFhxtATVyIB/9kFt8KGA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kqw+WNQWTcuWYA109+MCTQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,231,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="269732926" Received: from amilburn-desk.amilburn-desk (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.106]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2026 00:19:32 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:19:29 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Gabriel Rondon Cc: Matti Vaittinen , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: accel: kionix-kx022a: unify staging buffer and convert to iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() Message-ID: References: <20260818215122.52715-1-grondon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260818215122.52715-1-grondon@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 10:51:20PM +0100, Gabriel Rondon wrote: > v1 was a single patch converting the two push sites to > iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(). Reviewing it, Jonathan pointed out that > the driver carries two separate staging areas holding the same thing > (buffer[8] and the scan struct), and asked to fold the cleanup into this > set. > > So v2 is a two-patch series: patch 1 drops the redundant buffer and > routes the one-shot read and the triggered handler through scan, and > patch 2 does the deprecated-API conversion, now with a single buffer to > push at both sites. Good job! Assuming my comments are being addressed, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko