From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF73416103; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787127630; cv=none; b=LozD158pMy79tsbcvQcZ/XQ5O/JBeWuoc4dDHZeDZQGuF89r1guMpgpwVHX/jPWudrRKaOFETFy39mkX5pq7otlzHX6bNdVoPU9VVD4IlVFfBFNM0Y9gdFaT+cP9j/uBHMD/1r+1Jjd92XkQ4jt9Tv1+42fjyz+RVMcC0xqbVCs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787127630; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xlMH0zLV+GN3Z+g/ZE0s2W2CYfFxTpHqtLRQ5fznyzM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ll0/zp675JQrQ4cVHmbPiyEo6qEKRSBqNo2Cl1UuoIrdUfGEVITnQmDOqG23gwacu4jD4pwmXofAdS4Q5eYlrQ5Dm5+ZwmDioxm8z9iC2Gm6EeN45wyNAobdVPT/t/CWvl3A2Qe4TuuRjZssWJ3IcQUTkkGk5pBBLGNcaFgbIDg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=bSBGO68W; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="bSBGO68W" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=xlMH0zLV+GN3Z+g/ZE0s2W2CYfFxTpHqtLRQ5fznyzM=; b=bSBGO68WYPSOxeVao+M5SvebeM Oo3wDFHp0dmL9/XRC6hKSxRJxiGAt+/zSXu8iVJiYrRurqGJdQqmhpyRNr3ohw9OxLN6ghrEq///t yWcCTNzOLsO2XeA+XibXODgpOlE4wntQv6pMOdBgCxaOhU443LgHrNvzqj3P8Nv7ixUfD17wPFlVl +CE0YLuoG4IDH4Wx1pdmwECvgVuXQ/UHx9RV7rIhFdb1tSKXHNLEx4DfmyF+keTnvyokT2pxAUFAn whisaI9YtgYYWuoMCaOW9C8TXsOS9gyDw64qOXKISLEH9bjxDeRoph1qo81RIR2t0ox78lWSLOVoP j1+Lk8mQ==; Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wwbWt-009eiB-1R; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:11 +0000 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 01:20:05 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: Sungho Bae Cc: Amit Shah , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sungho Bae , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_console: allocate the port_buffer with the caller's gfp Message-ID: References: <20260810-serial-v1-1-abbe51602c13@debian.org> <6B66D650-D65F-4176-ACBF-DC42488883AB@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6B66D650-D65F-4176-ACBF-DC42488883AB@gmail.com> X-Debian-User: leitao Hello Sungho, On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 11:39:26AM +0900, Sungho Bae wrote: > I am sorry for the late reply. > I fully agree with your patch. > It was my mistake. I should have to allocate the buffer with gfp flags. > Thank you for the corrections. Thanks, would you mind adding your reviewed-by or acked-by tag, please? --breno