From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFFA63C13EF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787167795; cv=none; b=UMyuSsO6rFbWEyKWEZlYd3bDZy8uFn3xI2C6RN0YqpPZvHhfn8cLskAHXHjcYgR3YhM5vGFFlLk1JoHvALqzCTup1VFoswQz9vYaH37B8dw4IpynnYRglQFndUzIUOgs/X91Ns2U34RBvXsCJ4j2pF7IqeHxnY1Q0I1ORQI6VIk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787167795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xH83xoYOUUW0cu8zz9lxVjU6L3bD7NJyzPBzwgXsb64=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dkaL554guUL4WbRMSVweimUTyij098eW1ks4Ug93tRG/O3mXW8i1/2wUj98rEOi0Fs8hOx3HDU3Ud8LLXshLKfalGKByQ43cIja1IOE824whcZaQ3tZo4XuDU+1eYLB80msY5N/tr+cPDDxkprNzeRIgh5eU0q5TXtdUCNcHRl0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oSsaz9mK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oSsaz9mK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 445501F00A3F; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:29:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787167793; bh=dI1YE9r8IzSedNeiLIr2lJ/aWBHHrdCrPxotuHGiax4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=oSsaz9mKvG3oe+9cPqIR5hNuxxSqxB0acDzEhwuUq8UISuHwEMj+DSEMkNabTDw7P uiBps3w/gHiHznUY7b1cV4w3HbZvq8NeYJhYL9TPc/3lpTc8QRGttuAnJB8i19cuSA VCMUaVVPKA8rHBfGB+tm07S8h5a7HCLlYr0bEvZe/UfzXXlYOe2C+QIbEJZPfjIQRU BpNLA8nd+mB4XG3WYOyqGcsVN1eUX3Bxw4b71NEUlvv2uh2//drtJkH44SoQXdouog lQ4rEfe6AJsGt1q5WNm4jILIrKxCMHh1VTIpSN9Lk8HN5MnAvxFn5MkI/rhqZ+vPPS T9Uhp5Q14EJ0A== Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 09:29:52 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Bradley Morgan Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Use raise_softirq() in bh_pool_kick_.*() Message-ID: References: <20260819141909.e2ZfmB3y@linutronix.de> <99C52400-BAB3-4B9A-AEB1-C4DEFB16A500@grrlz.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <99C52400-BAB3-4B9A-AEB1-C4DEFB16A500@grrlz.net> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 03:34:00PM +0100, Bradley Morgan wrote: > Well, sure, me personally don't see any issues in this code, makes life > easier > > Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan I've been getting these review responses without much content on patches across multiple subsystems. I'm leaning towards ignoring going forward. If I'm jumping the gun prematurely, please let me know. -- tejun